The Sleeve Bypass Trial: a multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing the long term outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass for morbid obesity in terms of excess BMI loss percentage and quality of life
- PMID: 26316928
- PMCID: PMC4550059
- DOI: 10.1186/s40608-015-0058-0
The Sleeve Bypass Trial: a multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing the long term outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass for morbid obesity in terms of excess BMI loss percentage and quality of life
Abstract
Background: Obesity is an increasing disease worldwide. Bariatric surgery is the only effective therapy to induce sufficient long-term weight loss for morbidly obese patients. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) is the gold standard surgical technique. Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) is a new promising bariatric procedure which has the advantage of maintaining an intact gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of both techniques. Our hypothesis is that LSG has a similar percentage excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) after 5 years compared to LRYGB.
Methods/design: The Sleeve Bypass Trial is a randomized multicentre clinical trial: patients eligible for bariatric surgery are randomized to either LSG or LRYGB. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m(2) or BMI 35 kg/m(2) with obesity related comorbidity (T2 DM, sleep apnoea, hypertension) are eligible for randomization. At randomization patients are stratified for centre, sex, T2 DM and BMI ≥ 50 kg/m(2). A total number of 620 patients will be enrolled and equally (1:1) randomized to both treatment arms. Only surgeons experienced in both operation techniques will participate in the Sleeve Bypass trial. The primary endpoint is the 5-year weight loss (%EBMIL) of LSG and LRYGB. Secondary endpoints are resolution of obesity related comorbidity, complications, revision bariatric surgery and quality of life (QOL) defined in various questionnaires.
Discussion: Long-term %EBMIL between the two treatment strategies used to be in favour of LRYGB, but more recent results throughout the world show similar %EBMIL in both techniques. If weight loss is comparable, obesity-related comorbidity and QOL after bariatric procedures should be taken into account when deciding on which surgical technique is to be preferred for certain subgroups in the future.
Trial registration: Dutch Trial Register: NTR 4741.
Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Bypass; Sleeve.
Similar articles
-
Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Weight Loss and Quality of Life at 7 Years in Patients With Morbid Obesity: The SLEEVEPASS Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Surg. 2021 Feb 1;156(2):137-146. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5666. JAMA Surg. 2021. PMID: 33295955 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Laparoscopic gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy in obese Korean patients.World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov 28;21(44):12612-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i44.12612. World J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26640337 Free PMC article.
-
Early results of the Swiss Multicentre Bypass or Sleeve Study (SM-BOSS): a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Ann Surg. 2013 Nov;258(5):690-4; discussion 695. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a67426. Ann Surg. 2013. PMID: 23989054 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Nonseverely Obese Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Obes Surg. 2020 May;30(5):1660-1670. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04378-2. Obes Surg. 2020. PMID: 31912466
-
Update on comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight loss, comorbidities, and quality of life at 5 years.BMC Surg. 2024 Jul 30;24(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02512-1. BMC Surg. 2024. PMID: 39080707 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
High-resolution Impedance Manometry after Sleeve Gastrectomy: Increased Intragastric Pressure and Reflux are Frequent Events.Obes Surg. 2016 Oct;26(10):2449-56. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2127-y. Obes Surg. 2016. PMID: 26956879
-
A Single-Center Comparison of Extended and Restricted THROMBOPROPHYLAXIS with LMWH after Metabolic Surgery.Obes Surg. 2020 Feb;30(2):553-559. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04188-6. Obes Surg. 2020. PMID: 31641983
-
Rate of Cardiovascular Events and Safety Outcomes Seven Years Following Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy.Ann Surg Open. 2023 May 31;4(2):e286. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000286. eCollection 2023 Jun. Ann Surg Open. 2023. PMID: 37601481 Free PMC article.
-
A brief history of bariatric surgery.Porto Biomed J. 2017 May-Jun;2(3):90-92. doi: 10.1016/j.pbj.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Mar 6. Porto Biomed J. 2017. PMID: 32258594 Free PMC article.
-
Response to: Letter to the Editor: Long-Term Results of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: 5 to 8-Year Results.Obes Surg. 2017 Jun;27(6):1625. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2656-z. Obes Surg. 2017. PMID: 28361491 No abstract available.
References
-
- James PT, Rigby N, Leach R; International Obesity Task Force. The obesity epidemic, metabolic syndrome and future prevention strategies. Eur J Carddiovasc Prev Rehab. 2004;11:3–8. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials