Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013:2013:583627.
doi: 10.1155/2013/583627. Epub 2013 Apr 14.

Serosorting and HIV/STI Infection among HIV-Negative MSM and Transgender People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Inform WHO Guidelines

Caitlin E Kennedy  1 , Laura J Bernard  2 , Kathryn E Muessig  3 , Kelika A Konda  4 , Elie A Akl  5 , Ying-Ru Lo  6 , Antonio Gerbase  6 , Kevin R O'Reilly  6
Affiliations
Review

Serosorting and HIV/STI Infection among HIV-Negative MSM and Transgender People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Inform WHO Guidelines

Caitlin E Kennedy et al. J Sex Transm Dis. 2013.

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between serosorting and HIV infection, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and quality of life among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender people. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and abstracted data. Meta-analyses were conducted using random effects models. Of 310 citations reviewed, 4 observational studies, all with MSM, met inclusion criteria. Compared to consistent condom use, serosorting was associated with increased risk of HIV (3 studies, odds ratio (OR): 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.21-2.70) and bacterial STIs (1 study, OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.44-1.83). Compared to no condom use, serosorting was associated with reduced risk of HIV (3 studies, OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.25-0.83) and bacterial STIs (1 study, OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.73-0.91). Among HIV-negative MSM, condom use appears to be more protective against HIV and STIs than serosorting and should be encouraged. However, serosorting may be better than no condom use as a harm reduction strategy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Disposition of articles in the search and screening process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Meta-analysis of odds of HIV infection associated with serosorting versus condom use.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Meta-analysis of odds of HIV infection associated with serosorting versus no condom use.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Eaton L. A., Kalichman S. C., Cain D. N., et al. Serosorting sexual partners and risk for HIV among men who have sex with men. The American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2007;33(6):479–485. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.08.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elford J. Changing patterns of sexual behaviour in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases. 2006;19(1):26–32. - PubMed
    1. Jin F., Crawford J., Prestage G. P., et al. Unprotected anal intercourse, risk reduction behaviours, and subsequent HIV infection in a cohort of homosexual men. AIDS. 2009;23(2):243–252. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32831fb51a. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Snowden J. M., Raymond H. F., McFarland W. Prevalence of seroadaptive behaviours of men who have sex with men, San Francisco, 2004. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2009;85(6):469–476. doi: 10.1136/sti.2009.036269. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilson D. P., Regan D. G., Heymer K. J., Jin F., Prestage G. P., Grulich A. E. Serosorting may increase the risk of HIV acquisition among men who have sex with men. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2010;37(1):13–17. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181b35549. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources