Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015:2015:835261.
doi: 10.1155/2015/835261. Epub 2015 Jun 25.

External Quality Assessment for the Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Urine Using Molecular Techniques in Belgium

Affiliations

External Quality Assessment for the Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Urine Using Molecular Techniques in Belgium

Bernard China et al. J Sex Transm Dis. 2015.

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis is a major cause of sexually transmitted bacterial disease worldwide. C. trachomatis is an intracellular bacterium and its growth in vitro requires cell culture facilities. The diagnosis is based on antigen detection and more recently on molecular nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAAT) that are considered fast, sensitive, and specific. In Belgium, External Quality Assessment (EQA) for the detection of C. trachomatis in urine by NAAT was introduced in 2008. From January 2008 to June 2012, nine surveys were organized. Fifty-eight laboratories participated in at least one survey. The EQA panels included positive and negative samples. The overall accuracy was 75.4%, the overall specificity was 97.6%, and the overall sensitivity was 71.4%. Two major issues were observed: the low sensitivity (45.3%) for the detection of low concentration samples and the incapacity of several methods to detect the Swedish variant of C. trachomatis. The reassuring point was that the overall proficiency of the Belgian laboratories tended to improve over time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Parameters per survey. Ac: accuracy; Se: sensitivity; Sp: specificity.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Score of the laboratories per sample. The number (N) of encoded results per sample was shown with the indication of the attributed score. 0 for a good answer, 1 for a wrong answer for an infrequently detected sample, 2 for a wrong answer for a detected sample, and 3 for a wrong answer for a frequently detected or a negative sample. The number of inhibition results was also indicated.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Means and standard deviation of the scores of the laboratories per survey for the detection of C. trachomatis using molecular techniques. The curves indicated the trends over the time.

Similar articles

References

    1. Gerbase A. C., Rowley J. T., Heymann D. H. L., Berkley S. F. B., Piot P. Global prevalence and incidence estimates of selected curable STDS. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 1998;74(supplement 1):S12–S16. - PubMed
    1. Miller W. C., Ford C. A., Morris M., et al. Prevalence of chlamydial and gonococcal infections among young adults in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2004;291(18):2229–2236. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.18.2229. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ducoffre G. Surveillance des maladies infectieuses par un réseau de laboratoires de microbiologie. Institut Scientifique de Santé Publique; 2010. https://www.wiv-isp.be/epidemio/epifr/plabfr/plabanfr/10_035f_v.pdf.
    1. Gaydos C., Essig A. Chlamydiaceae in Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 10th. Washington, DC, USA: ASM Press; 2011. (edited by: J. Versalovic).
    1. Nunes A., Nogueira P. J., Borrego M. J., Gomes J. P. Chlamydia trachomatis diversity viewed as a tissue-specific coevolutionary arms race. Genome Biology. 2008;9(10, article R153) doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-10-r153. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources