Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug 28;10(8):e0136012.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136012. eCollection 2015.

Hypertonic Saline Dextran Ameliorates Organ Damage in Beagle Hemorrhagic Shock

Affiliations

Hypertonic Saline Dextran Ameliorates Organ Damage in Beagle Hemorrhagic Shock

Jing-xiang Zhao et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of hypertonic saline with 6% Dextran-70 (HSD) resuscitation on organ damage and the resuscitation efficiency of the combination of HSD and lactated ringers (LR) in a model of hemorrhage shock in dogs.

Methods: Beagles were bled to hold their mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 50 ± 5 mmHg for 1 h. After hemorrhage, beagles were divided into three groups (n = 7) to receive pre-hospital resuscitation for 1 h (R1): HSD (4 ml/kg), LR (40 ml/kg), and HSD+LR (a combination of 4 ml/kg HSD and 40 ml/kg LR). Next, LR was transfused into all groups as in-hospital resuscitation (R2). After two hours of observation (R3), autologous blood was transfused. Hemodynamic responses and systemic oxygenation were measured at predetermined phases. Three days after resuscitation, the animals were sacrificed and tissues including kidney, lung, liver and intestinal were obtained for pathological analysis.

Results: Although the initial resuscitation with HSD was shown to be faster than LR with regard to an ascending MAP, the HSD group showed a similar hemodynamic performance compared to the LR group throughout the experiment. Compared with the LR group, the systemic oxygenation performance in the HSD group was similar but showed a lower venous-to-arterial CO2 gradient (Pv-aCO2) at R3 (p < 0.05). Additionally, the histology score of the kidneys, lungs and liver were significantly lower in the HSD group than in the LR group (p < 0.05). The HSD+LR group showed a superior hemodynamic response but higher extravascular lung water (EVLW) and lower arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) than the other groups (p < 0.05). The HSD+LR group showed a marginally improved systemic oxygenation performance and lower histology score than other groups.

Conclusions: Resuscitation after hemorrhagic shock with a bolus of HSD showed a similar hemodynamic response compared with LR at ten times the volume of HSD, but HSD showed superior efficacy in organ protection. Our findings suggest that resuscitation with the combination of HSD and LR in the pre-hospital setting is an effective treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Experimental protocol.
Following an equilibration period, baseline (BL) measurements of all parameters were recorded, and subsequent blood was rapidly withdrawn until a mean arterial pressure of approximately 50±5 mm Hg was reached and maintained for another 60 minutes (hypovolemia period). All measurements were then recorded (post-hemorrhage, PH, time = 0 min), and the animals were separately resuscitated with HSD, LR or HSD+LR over 60 minutes (Resuscitation1, R1, time = 60 min). Then, during the in-hospital resuscitation phase, LR were started as a transfusion for all animals until the MAP reached 85% of the baseline value (Resuscitation 2, R2, time = 120 min). After a two-hour observation period (Resuscitation 3, R3, time = 240 min), all animals received blood transfusions (70% of their blood loss) so that they would survive for three days of observation. Then, the dogs were sacrificed with an IV bolus injection of pentobarbital, and their tissues including their kidneys, lungs, liver and intestines were obtained for pathological analysis.
Fig 2
Fig 2. MAP in the LR, HSD and HSD+LR groups, measured at different time intervals.
Pre-hospital resuscitation (0-60min) from hemorrhagic shock respectively with (1) 40ml/kg lactated ringers at a constant rate of 20 ml/min (LR group), (2) a bolus of HSD (4ml/kg) over a fixed interval of 2 min (HSD group), or (3) an initial bolus of HSD (4ml/kg) with a continued infusion of 40ml/kg Lactated Ringer (HSD+LR group). Subsequently all groups were injected with lactated ringers in in-hospital (60-90min) until the MAP reached 85% of the baseline level. *P<0.05 vs LR (black square); #P<0.05 vs HSD (open circle); &P<0.05 vs HSD+LR (shaded triangle). n = 7 for all groups.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Hemodynamic parameters changes after hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation.
Pre-hospital resuscitation (0-60min) from hemorrhagic shock respectively with (1) 40ml/kg lactated ringers at a constant rate of 20 ml/min (LR group), (2) a bolus of HSD (4ml/kg) over a fixed interval of 2 min (HSD group), or (3) an initial bolus of HSD (4ml/kg) with a continued infusion of 40ml/kg Lactated Ringer (HSD+LR group). Subsequently all groups were injected with lactated ringers in in-hospital (60-90min) until the MAP reached 85% of the baseline level. (A) cardiac index (CI). (B) systolic volume index (SVI). (C) global end-diastolic index (GEDVI). (D) total intrathoracic blood index (ITBI). (E) systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI). (F) extravascular lung water (EVLW) (G) pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI). (H) arterial oxygen tension (PaO2). *P<0.05 vs LR (black square); #P<0.05 vs HSD (open circle); &P<0.05 vs HSD+LR (shaded triangle). n = 7 for all groups.
Fig 4
Fig 4. The changes of MAP and CI in the LR and HSD group during the pre-hospital period.
(A) mean arterial pressure (MAP). (B) cardiac index (CI). A bolus of HSD (4ml/kg) was injected intravenously over a fixed interval of 2 min (HSD group). While, 40ml/kg Lactated ringers were intravenously infused at a constant rate of 20 ml/min (LR group). Therefore, the HSD infusion was completed more quickly and thus produced a faster increase in the MAP and CI than those with the LR infusion. *P<0.05 vs LR (black square); #P<0.05 vs HSD (open circle). n = 7 for all groups.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Systemic oxygenation parameters in the LR, HSD and HSD+LR groups presented at baseline (BL, time = -90 min), end of controlled bleeding (post-hemorrhage, PH, time = 0 min), end of pre-hospital resuscitation (Resuscitation1, R1, time = 60 min), end of in-hospital resuscitation (Resuscitation2, R2, time = 120 min), and 3 h after in-hospital resuscitation (Resuscitation3, R3, time = 240 min).
(A) Systemic oxygen transport (DO2). (B) Systemic oxygen uptake (VO2). (C) Central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2). (D) Venous-to-arterial CO2 gradient (Pv-aCO2). (E) Arterial lactate (Lac). (F) Hb concentration. *P<0.05 vs LR; #P<0.05 vs HSD. n = 7 for all groups.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Effect of different HSD resuscitation strategies on organ damage.
(A) The total urine output during the anesthetic period. (B) Plasma levels of urea nitrogen (BUN) and alanine aminotransferase (AST) measured at baseline (BL, time = -90 min), end of controlled bleeding (post-hemorrhage, PH, time = 0 min), 3 h after in-hospital resuscitation (Resuscitation3, R3, time = 240 min), and after one to three days of resuscitation (1d, 2d, 3d); After three days of resuscitation, the dogs were sacrificed and their tissues including kidney, lung, liver and intestinal were obtained for histological analysis. (C) Kidney histologic scores and appearance. (D) Lung histologic scores and appearance. (E) Liver histologic scores and appearance. (F) Intestinal histologic scores and appearance. H&E staining and Periodic Acid-Schiff staining for organs. original magnification, 200×. *P<0.05 vs LR; #P<0.05 vs HSD. n = 6 for all groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wade CE, Dubick MA, Vassar MJ, Perry CA, Holcroft JW (1996) Plasma dextran concentrations in trauma patients administered hypertonic saline-dextran-70. Clin Chem 42:779–780. - PubMed
    1. Riddez L, Stahlberg H, Suneson A, Hjelmqvist H (2001) Early resuscitation with hypertonic saline/dextran in uncontrolled intra-abdominal bleeding in swine combined with a soft tissue gunshot wound. Mil Med 166:695–699. - PubMed
    1. Bickell WH, Bruttig SP, Millnamow GA, O'Benar J, Wade CE (1992) Use of hypertonic saline/ dextran versus lactated Ringer's solution as a resuscitation fluid after uncontrolled aortic hemorrhage in anesthetized swine. Ann Emerg Med 21:1077–1085. - PubMed
    1. Vassar MJ, Perry CA, Gannaway WL, Holcroft JW (1991) 7.5% sodium chloride/dextran for resuscitation of trauma patients undergoing helicopter transport. Arch Surg 126: 1065–1072. - PubMed
    1. Mattox KL, Maningas PA, Moore EE, Mateer JR, Marx JA, Aprahamian C, et al. (1991) Prehospital hypertonic saline/dextran infusion for post-traumatic hypotension. The U.S.A. Multicenter Trial. Ann Surg 213:482–491. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources