Stillbirth evaluation: a stepwise assessment of placental pathology and autopsy
- PMID: 26319054
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.049
Stillbirth evaluation: a stepwise assessment of placental pathology and autopsy
Abstract
Background: The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places special emphasis on autopsy as one of the most important tests for evaluation of stillbirth. Despite a recommendation of an autopsy, many families will decline the autopsy based on religious/cultural beliefs, fear of additional suffering for the child, or belief that no additional information will be obtained or of value. Further, many obstetric providers express a myriad of barriers limiting their recommendation for a perinatal autopsy despite their understanding of its value. Consequently, perinatal autopsy rates have been declining. Without the information provided by an autopsy, many women are left with unanswered questions regarding cause of death for their fetus and without clear management strategies to reduce the risk of stillbirth in future pregnancies. To avoid this scenario, it is imperative that clinicians are knowledgeable about the benefit of autopsy so they can provide clear information on its diagnostic utility and decrease potential barriers; in so doing the obstetrician can ensure that each family has the necessary information to make an informed decision.
Objective: We sought to quantify the contribution of placental pathologic examination and autopsy in identifying a cause of stillbirth and to identify how often clinical management is modified due to each result.
Study design: This is a cohort study of all cases of stillbirth from 2009 through 2013 at a single tertiary care center. Records were reviewed in a stepwise manner: first the clinical history and laboratory results, then the placental pathologic evaluation, and finally the autopsy. At each step, a cause of death and the certainty of that etiology were coded. Clinical changes that would be recommended by information available at each step were also recorded.
Results: Among the 144 cases of stillbirth examined, 104 (72%) underwent autopsy and these cases constitute the cohort of study. The clinical and laboratory information alone identified a cause of death in 35 (24%). After placental pathologic examination, 88 (61%) cases had a probable cause of death identified. The addition of autopsy resulted in 78 (74%) cases having an identifiable probable cause of death. Placental examination alone changed clinical management in 52 (36%) cases. Autopsy led to additional clinical management changes in 6 (6%) cases.
Conclusion: This stepwise assessment of the benefit of both placental pathological examination and autopsy in changing probable cause of death beyond traditional clinical history and laboratory results emphasizes the need to implement more comprehensive evaluation of all stillbirths. With the aim of providing a cause of stillbirth to the parents, and to prevent future stillbirths, it behooves health care professionals to understand the value of this more comprehensive approach and convey that information to the bereaved parents.
Keywords: autopsy; perinatal pathology; placental pathology; stillbirth.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
How important is placental examination in cases of perinatal deaths?Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2011 Mar-Apr;14(2):99-104. doi: 10.2350/10-07-0870-OA.1. Epub 2010 Aug 18. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2011. PMID: 20718631
-
Minimally invasive autopsy for fetuses and children based on a combination of post-mortem MRI and endoscopic examination: a feasibility study.Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(46):1-104. doi: 10.3310/hta23460. Health Technol Assess. 2019. PMID: 31461397 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of causes of stillbirth through autopsy and placental examination reports.Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2014 Feb;33(1):49-54. doi: 10.3109/15513815.2013.850132. Epub 2013 Nov 5. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2014. PMID: 24192061
-
Understanding the clinical utility of stillbirth investigations: a scoping review.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 28;25(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07345-1. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025. PMID: 40022069 Free PMC article.
-
A review of findings from placental histology in cases of stillbirth following the amendment to the Coroner's Act.Ir J Med Sci. 2021 Nov;190(4):1435-1437. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02446-6. Epub 2021 Jan 6. Ir J Med Sci. 2021. PMID: 33405055 Review.
Cited by
-
Facility-based stillbirth review processes used in different countries across the world: a systematic review.EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Apr 27;59:101976. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101976. eCollection 2023 May. EClinicalMedicine. 2023. PMID: 37180470 Free PMC article.
-
Machine Learning Assessment of Gestational Age in Accelerated Maturation, Delayed Maturation, Villous Edema, Chorangiosis, and Intrauterine Fetal Demise.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2025 Jun 1;149(6):503-510. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2024-0274-OA. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2025. PMID: 39370142
-
Diagnostic evaluation to identify infection-attributable stillbirth.J Perinatol. 2025 Jul;45(7):971-976. doi: 10.1038/s41372-025-02253-w. Epub 2025 Mar 6. J Perinatol. 2025. PMID: 40050406 Free PMC article.
-
Antepartum and intrapartum stillbirth rates across gestation: a cross-sectional study using the revised foetal death reporting system in the U.S.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Nov 29;22(1):885. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05185-x. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022. PMID: 36447143 Free PMC article.
-
The prediction of fetal death with a simple maternal blood test at 20-24 weeks: a role for angiogenic index-1 (PlGF/sVEGFR-1 ratio).Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;217(6):682.e1-682.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 13. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 29037482 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical