Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Aug 29;6(1):159.
doi: 10.1186/s13287-015-0143-9.

Endpoints in stem cell trials in ischemic heart failure

Affiliations
Review

Endpoints in stem cell trials in ischemic heart failure

Marko Banovic et al. Stem Cell Res Ther. .

Abstract

Despite multimodal regimens and diverse treatment options alleviating disease symptoms, morbidity and mortality associated with advanced ischemic heart failure remain high. Recently, technological innovation has led to the development of regenerative therapeutic interventions aimed at halting or reversing the vicious cycle of heart failure progression. Driven by the unmet patient need and fueled by encouraging experimental studies, stem cell-based clinical trials have been launched over the past decade. Collectively, these trials have enrolled several thousand patients and demonstrated the clinical feasibility and safety of cell-based interventions. However, the totality of evidence supporting their efficacy in ischemic heart failure remains limited. Experience from the early randomized stem cell clinical trials underscores the key points in trial design ranging from adequate hypothesis formulation to selection of the optimal patient population, cell type and delivery route. Importantly, to translate the unprecedented promise of regenerative biotherapies into clinical benefit, it is crucial to ensure the appropriate choice of endpoints along the regulatory path. Accordingly, we here provide considerations relevant to the choice of endpoints for regenerative clinical trials in the ischemic heart failure setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hanna BE, Hennebry TA, Abu-Fadel MS. Combined reperfusion strategies in ST-segment elevation MI: rationale and current role. Clev Clin J Med. 2010;77:629–38. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.77a.10024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kovacic JC, Castellano JM, Fuster V. Cardiovascular defence challenges at the basic, clinical, and populations level. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1254:1–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06495.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bartunek J, Vanderheyden M, Hill J, Terzic A. Cells as biologic for cardiac repair in ischemic heart failure. Heart. 2010;96:792–800. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.139394. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martin-Rendon E, Brunskill SJ, Hyde CJ, Stanworth SJ, Mathur A, Watt SM. Autologous bone marrow stem cells to treat acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:1807–18. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn220. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abdel-Latif A, Bolli R, Tieyjeh IM, Montori VM, Perin EC, Hornung CA, et al. Adult bone marrow- derived cells for cardiac repair: a systematic review and meta analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:989–97. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.10.989. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms