Clinical outcomes of helical tomotherapy for super-elderly patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer: comparison with patients under 80 years of age
- PMID: 26320208
- PMCID: PMC4628216
- DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrv040
Clinical outcomes of helical tomotherapy for super-elderly patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer: comparison with patients under 80 years of age
Abstract
We investigated the clinical outcomes of helical tomotherapy in 23 patients aged ≥80 years with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer and compared the results with data from 171 patients under 80 years. All patients received helical tomotherapy in our hospital between September 2009 and October 2012. The median follow-up periods were 35 months in the aged group and 34 months in the younger group. The median prescribed dose in helical tomotherapy was 78 Gy in 39 fractions (range, 72-78 Gy). The 3-year overall survival and biochemical relapse-free rates were 92% and 96% in the aged group and 99.4% and 97.3% in the younger group, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the biochemical relapse-free rates. The 3-year cumulative incidences of late Grade 2 or higher rectal toxicity and urinary toxicity were 13% and 4.8% in the aged group and 7.0% and 1.2% in the younger group, respectively. There was no significant difference between the aged group and the younger group in the cumulative incidence rates of rectal toxicity or urinary toxicity. No patients exhibited Grade 4 or higher toxicity, and all patients improved with conservative therapy. Helical tomotherapy in super-elderly patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer had good biochemical control rates without severe late toxicity. Definitive helical tomotherapy may be the treatment of choice for patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer, even in those older than 80 years of age.
Keywords: helical tomotherapy (TOMO); intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT); prostate cancer; super-elderly patients.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.
Figures
Comment in
-
Re: Clinical Outcomes of Helical Tomotherapy for Super-Elderly Patients with Localized and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: Comparison with Patients under 80 Years of Age.J Urol. 2016 Jul;196(1):107. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.04.015. Epub 2016 Apr 14. J Urol. 2016. PMID: 27321509 No abstract available.
References
-
- Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012;62:10–29. - PubMed
-
- Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer 49: 2013;1374–403. - PubMed
-
- Matsuda A, Matsuda T, Shibata A, et al. Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2007: a study of 21 population-based cancer registries for the Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan (MCIJ) project. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2013;43:328–36. - PubMed
-
- Ries LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2005, National Cancer Institute 2008. http://seer.cancer.gov/archive/csr/1975_2005/ (4 June 2015, date last accessed).
-
- Projections of the population by age and sex for the United States: 2010 to 2050 (NP2008-T12). Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau, Population Division, 2011.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
