Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug;19(8):474-8.
doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.162469.

Prehospital transport practices prevalent among patients presenting to the pediatric emergency of a tertiary care hospital

Affiliations

Prehospital transport practices prevalent among patients presenting to the pediatric emergency of a tertiary care hospital

Jhuma Sankar et al. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Prehospital transport practices prevalent among children presenting to the emergency are under-reported. Our objectives were to evaluate the prehospital transport practices prevalent among children presenting to the pediatric emergency and their subsequent clinical course and outcome.

Methods: In this prospective observational study we enrolled all children ≤17 years of age presenting to the pediatric emergency (from January to June 2013) and recorded their demographic data and variables pertaining to prehospital transport practices. Data was entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed using Stata 11 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).

Results: A total of 319 patients presented to the emergency during the study period. Acute gastroenteritis, respiratory tract infection and fever were the most common reasons for presentation to the emergency. Seventy-three (23%) children required admission. Most commonly used public transport was auto-rickshaw (138, 43.5%) and median time taken to reach hospital was 22 min (interquartile range: 5, 720). Twenty-six patients were referred from another health facility. Of these, 25 were transported in ambulance unaccompanied. About 8% (25) of parents reported having difficulties in transporting their child to the hospital and 57% (181) of parents felt fellow passengers and drivers were unhelpful. On post-hoc analysis, only time taken to reach the hospital (30 vs. 20 min; relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 1.02 [1.007, 1.03], P = 0.003) and the illness nature were significant (45% vs. 2.6%; 0.58 [0.50, 0.67], P ≤ 0.0001) on multivariate analysis.

Conclusions: In relation to prehospital transport among pediatric patients we observed that one-quarter of children presenting to the emergency required admission, the auto-rickshaw was the commonest mode of transport and that there is a lack of prior communication before referring patients for further management.

Keywords: Auto-rickshaw; delay in transport; inter-hospital transport; mode of transport; pediatric emergency; septic shock; transport.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: There are no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Emergency Care for Children: Growing Pains. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2007. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies; pp. 2–3.
    1. Orr RA, Felmet KA, Han Y, McCloskey KA, Dragotta MA, Bills DM, et al. Pediatric specialized transport teams are associated with improved outcomes. Pediatrics. 2009;124:40–8. - PubMed
    1. Odetola FO, Rosenberg AL, Davis MM, Clark SJ, Dechert RE, Shanley TP. Do outcomes vary according to the source of admission to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit? Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008;9:20–5. - PubMed
    1. Limprayoon K, Sonjaipanich S, Susiva C. Transportation of critically ill patient to pediatric intensive care unit, Siriraj Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88(Suppl 8):S86–91. - PubMed
    1. Santhanam I, Pai M, Kasturi K, Radhamani MP. Mortality after admission in the pediatric emergency department: A prospective study from a referral children's hospital in southern India. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2002;3:358–63. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources