Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug 14:6:1184.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01184. eCollection 2015.

Theory of mind: a new perspective on the puzzle of belief ascription

Affiliations

Theory of mind: a new perspective on the puzzle of belief ascription

Gabriella Airenti. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The concept of theory of mind (ToM) has considerably changed since its first proposal. The aim of first human studies was to understand how young children acquire the representation of others' mental states, in particular beliefs, and how they distinguish them from their own and from reality. The False Belief Task was designed to prove the acquisition of this capacity. According to children's performance in this test the acquisition of ToM has been attested at around 4 years of age. In last years it has been shown that using spontaneous response tasks also 15-month-old-children could attribute to an agent a false belief about the location of an object. These results have generated the puzzle of belief-ascription: Why do 3-year-old children fail the classical false belief tasks whereas much younger children show the correct expectation in the spontaneous response tasks? In this paper I shall argue that (i) infants and young children, when confronted with the two forms of false belief tasks do not face the same problem and (ii) behind the two testing situations there are different ways to understand theory of mind. I shall propose that what appears in infants is the natural human disposition to intersubjectivity.

Keywords: deceit; false belief; intersubjectivity; irony; theory of mind.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Airenti G., Angeleri R. (2011). Dealing with sincerity: pathways of communication in young children. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 29, 765–782. 10.1348/2044-835X.002007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Angeleri R., Airenti G. (2014). The development of joke and irony understanding: a study with 3- to 6-year-old children. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 68, 133–146. 10.1037/cep0000011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Apperly I. A. (2012). What is “theory of mind”? Concepts, cognitive processes and individual differences. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 65, 825–839. 10.1080/17470218.2012.676055 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Apperly I. A., Butterfill S. A. (2009). Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Psychol. Rev. 116, 953–970. 10.1037/a0016923 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baillargeon R., Scott R. M., He Z. (2010). False-belief understanding in infants. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 110–118. 10.1016/j.tics.2009.12.006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources