Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan;45(1):132-44.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0343-8. Epub 2015 Sep 1.

Bully Victimization: Selection and Influence Within Adolescent Friendship Networks and Cliques

Gerine M A Lodder  1 , Ron H J Scholte  2   3 , Antonius H N Cillessen  2 , Matteo Giletta  4
Affiliations

Bully Victimization: Selection and Influence Within Adolescent Friendship Networks and Cliques

Gerine M A Lodder et al. J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

Adolescents tend to form friendships with similar peers and, in turn, their friends further influence adolescents' behaviors and attitudes. Emerging work has shown that these selection and influence processes also might extend to bully victimization. However, no prior work has examined selection and influence effects involved in bully victimization within cliques, despite theoretical account emphasizing the importance of cliques in this regard. This study examined selection and influence processes in adolescence regarding bully victimization both at the level of the entire friendship network and the level of cliques. We used a two-wave design (5-month interval). Participants were 543 adolescents (50.1% male, Mage = 15.8) in secondary education. Stochastic actor-based models indicated that at the level of the larger friendship network, adolescents tended to select friends with similar levels of bully victimization as they themselves. In addition, adolescent friends influenced each other in terms of bully victimization over time. Actor Parter Interdependence models showed that similarities in bully victimization between clique members were not due to selection of clique members. For boys, average clique bully victimization predicted individual bully victimization over time (influence), but not vice versa. No influence was found for girls, indicating that different mechanisms may underlie friend influence on bully victimization for girls and boys. The differences in results at the level of the larger friendship network versus the clique emphasize the importance of taking the type of friendship ties into account in research on selection and influence processes involved in bully victimization.

Keywords: Adolescence; Bully victimization; Cliques; Friendship networks; Influence; Selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
APIM models to test selection and influence effects. a The model to test influence effects, b the model to test selection effects
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Adler PA, Adler P. Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press; 1998.
    1. Arseneault L, Bowes L, Shakoor S. Bullying victimization in youths and mental health problems: Much ado about nothing? Psychological Medicine. 2010;40(5):717–729. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709991383. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bagwell CL, Coie JD, Terry RA, Lochman JE. Peer clique participation and social status in preadolescence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly-Journal of Developmental Psychology. 2000;46(2):280–305.
    1. Bagwell CL, Schmidt ME. The friendship quality of overtly and relationally victimized children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 2011;57(2):158–185. doi: 10.1353/mpq.2011.0009. - DOI
    1. Batanova M, Espelage DL, Rao MA. Early adolescents’ willingness to intervene: What roles do attributions, affect, coping, and self-reported victimization play? Journal of School Psychology. 2014;52(3):279–293. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2014.02.001. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources