Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Sep 1:16:231.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0685-0.

Association between work-related biomechanical risk factors and the occurrence of carpal tunnel syndrome: an overview of systematic reviews and a meta-analysis of current research

Agnessa Kozak  1 , Grita Schedlbauer  2 , Tanja Wirth  3 , Ulrike Euler  4 , Claudia Westermann  5 , Albert Nienhaus  6   7
Affiliations
Review

Association between work-related biomechanical risk factors and the occurrence of carpal tunnel syndrome: an overview of systematic reviews and a meta-analysis of current research

Agnessa Kozak et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Occupational risks for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) have been examined in various occupations, and several systematic reviews (SRs) have been published on this topic. There has been no critical appraisal or synthesis of the evidence in the SRs. The aims of this study are (1) to synthesise the observational evidence and evaluate the methodological quality of SRs that assess the effect of biomechanical risk factors on the development of CTS in workers, (2) to provide an update of current primary research on this association, (3) to assess a potential dose-response relationship.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library and the reference lists of articles. The first step covered SRs (1998-2014), and the second step covered current primary studies (2011-2014). The methodological quality of the SRs was evaluated by using the AMSTAR-R tool; primary studies were assessed using a list of 20 items. A qualitative approach was used for synthesising evidence. In addition, we undertook a meta-analysis of the primary studies to determine risk ratios in the dose-response relationship.

Results: We identified ten SRs that covered a total of 143 original studies. Seven primary studies met the criteria for inclusion, of which four provided longitudinal data. We found high quality of evidence for risk factors such as repetition, force and combined exposures. Moderate quality of evidence was observed for vibration, and low quality of evidence was found for wrist postures. An association between computer use and CTS could not be established. Recent primary studies supported the existence of a significant relationship between CTS and repetition, force and combined exposure. The meta-analysis of current research revealed a dose-response relationship between CTS and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists' (ACGIH) threshold limit value (TLV) for hand-activity level (HAL). Those between the action limit and TLV and above TLV had RR of 1.5 (95% CI 1.02-2.31) and RR 2.0 (95% CI 1.46-2.82), respectively.

Conclusions: Occupational biomechanical factors play a substantial role in the causation of CTS. Data from current primary studies on dose-response suggest that the risk of CTS increases with the ACGIH TLV levels.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the selected systematic reviews
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flowchart of the selected primary studies
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot of TLV for HAL – below AL versus between AL and the TLV. Outcome: CTS. Abbreviations: AL, action limit; CI, confidence interval; CTS, carpal tunnel syndrome; HAL, hand activity level; TLV, threshold limit value
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot of TLV for HAL – below AL versus TLV and above. Outcome: CTS. Abbreviations: AL, action limit; CI, confidence interval; CTS, carpal tunnel syndrome; HAL, hand activity level; TLV, threshold limit value
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hagberg M, Morgenstern H, Kelsh M. Impact of occupations and job tasks on the prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1992;18:337–345. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1564. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hegmann KT, Thiese MS, Wood EM, Garg A, Kapellusch JM, Foster J, Biggs J, Edwards H, Wertsch J, Kendall R. Impacts of differences in epidemiological case definitions on prevalence for upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Hum Factors. 2014;56:191–202. doi: 10.1177/0018720813487202. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosen I. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA. 1999;282:153–158. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.2.153. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Krom MC, Knipschild PG, Kester AD, Thijs CT, Boekkooi PF, Spaans F. Carpal tunnel syndrome: prevalence in the general population. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:373–376. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90038-O. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tanaka S, Wild DK, Seligman PJ, Behrens V, Cameron L, Putz-Anderson V. The US prevalence of self-reported carpal tunnel syndrome: 1988 National Health Interview Survey data. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:1846–1848. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.84.11.1846. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms