Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Sep 26;370(1678):20140333.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0333.

Origin of eukaryotes from within archaea, archaeal eukaryome and bursts of gene gain: eukaryogenesis just made easier?

Affiliations
Review

Origin of eukaryotes from within archaea, archaeal eukaryome and bursts of gene gain: eukaryogenesis just made easier?

Eugene V Koonin. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

The origin of eukaryotes is a fundamental, forbidding evolutionary puzzle. Comparative genomic analysis clearly shows that the last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA) possessed most of the signature complex features of modern eukaryotic cells, in particular the mitochondria, the endomembrane system including the nucleus, an advanced cytoskeleton and the ubiquitin network. Numerous duplications of ancestral genes, e.g. DNA polymerases, RNA polymerases and proteasome subunits, also can be traced back to the LECA. Thus, the LECA was not a primitive organism and its emergence must have resulted from extensive evolution towards cellular complexity. However, the scenario of eukaryogenesis, and in particular the relationship between endosymbiosis and the origin of eukaryotes, is far from being clear. Four recent developments provide new clues to the likely routes of eukaryogenesis. First, evolutionary reconstructions suggest complex ancestors for most of the major groups of archaea, with the subsequent evolution dominated by gene loss. Second, homologues of signature eukaryotic proteins, such as actin and tubulin that form the core of the cytoskeleton or the ubiquitin system, have been detected in diverse archaea. The discovery of this 'dispersed eukaryome' implies that the archaeal ancestor of eukaryotes was a complex cell that might have been capable of a primitive form of phagocytosis and thus conducive to endosymbiont capture. Third, phylogenomic analyses converge on the origin of most eukaryotic genes of archaeal descent from within the archaeal evolutionary tree, specifically, the TACK superphylum. Fourth, evidence has been presented that the origin of the major archaeal phyla involved massive acquisition of bacterial genes. Taken together, these findings make the symbiogenetic scenario for the origin of eukaryotes considerably more plausible and the origin of the organizational complexity of eukaryotic cells more readily explainable than they appeared until recently.

Keywords: archaea; cytoskeleton; endosymbiosis; horizontal gene transfer; phagocytosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A schematic evolutionary tree of the archaea, the likely origin of eukaryotes and the distribution of eukaryome components. The tree topology is from [73] except that the DPANN branch was moved to the base of the Euryarchaeota according to [–77]. The size of the triangles very roughly shows the diversity of the respective groups. The hypothetical lineages of eukaryote ancestors are tentatively shown as a deep branch within the TACK superphylum. The inferred origins of some key eukaryotic genes and functional systems [78] are indicated by red lines; S30, L25 and L13 are ribosomal proteins; Ub-E123-MPN denotes the ubiquitin system where E123 are the respective subunits of the ubiquitin ligase and MPN is the deubiquitinase. The green arrows from bacteria denote the gene flow associated with the origin of the major groups of archaea [79]. The thick arrow pointing at the putative ancestor of eukaryotes denotes the massive gene flow from the endosymbiont.

References

    1. Lane N, Martin W. 2010. The energetics of genome complexity. Nature 467, 929–934. (10.1038/nature09486) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lane N. 2011. Energetics and genetics across the prokaryote–eukaryote divide. Biol. Direct 6, 35 (10.1186/1745-6150-6-35) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lane N. 2015. The vital question: energy, evolution, and the origins of complex life. London, UK: W.W. Norton & Company.
    1. Hudder A, Nathanson L, Deutscher MP. 2003. Organization of mammalian cytoplasm. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 9318–9326. (10.1128/MCB.23.24.9318-9326.2003) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guigas G, Kalla C, Weiss M. 2007. The degree of macromolecular crowding in the cytoplasm and nucleoplasm of mammalian cells is conserved. FEBS Lett. 581, 5094–5098. (10.1016/j.febslet.2007.09.054) - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources