Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2015 Sep 1;314(9):913-25.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10080.

Integrative Clinical Sequencing in the Management of Refractory or Relapsed Cancer in Youth

Affiliations
Observational Study

Integrative Clinical Sequencing in the Management of Refractory or Relapsed Cancer in Youth

Rajen J Mody et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: Cancer is caused by a diverse array of somatic and germline genomic aberrations. Advances in genomic sequencing technologies have improved the ability to detect these molecular aberrations with greater sensitivity. However, integrating them into clinical management in an individualized manner has proven challenging.

Objective: To evaluate the use of integrative clinical sequencing and genetic counseling in the assessment and treatment of children and young adults with cancer.

Design, setting, and participants: Single-site, observational, consecutive case series (May 2012-October 2014) involving 102 children and young adults (mean age, 10.6 years; median age, 11.5 years, range, 0-22 years) with relapsed, refractory, or rare cancer.

Exposures: Participants underwent integrative clinical exome (tumor and germline DNA) and transcriptome (tumor RNA) sequencing and genetic counseling. Results were discussed by a precision medicine tumor board, which made recommendations to families and their physicians.

Main outcomes and measures: Proportion of patients with potentially actionable findings, results of clinical actions based on integrative clinical sequencing, and estimated proportion of patients or their families at risk of future cancer.

Results: Of the 104 screened patients, 102 enrolled with 91 (89%) having adequate tumor tissue to complete sequencing. Only the 91 patients were included in all calculations, including 28 (31%) with hematological malignancies and 63 (69%) with solid tumors. Forty-two patients (46%) had actionable findings that changed their cancer management: 15 of 28 (54%) with hematological malignancies and 27 of 63 (43%) with solid tumors. Individualized actions were taken in 23 of the 91 (25%) based on actionable integrative clinical sequencing findings, including change in treatment for 14 patients (15%) and genetic counseling for future risk for 9 patients (10%). Nine of 91 (10%) of the personalized clinical interventions resulted in ongoing partial clinical remission of 8 to 16 months or helped sustain complete clinical remission of 6 to 21 months. All 9 patients and families with actionable incidental genetic findings agreed to genetic counseling and screening.

Conclusions and relevance: In this single-center case series involving young patients with relapsed or refractory cancer, incorporation of integrative clinical sequencing data into clinical management was feasible, revealed potentially actionable findings in 46% of patients, and was associated with change in treatment and family genetic counseling for a small proportion of patients. The lack of a control group limited assessing whether better clinical outcomes resulted from this approach than outcomes that would have occurred with standard care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: A.M.C. serves on the scientific advisory board of Paradigm Diagnostics which is a non-profit tumor sequencing company of the University of Michigan. Paradigm was not involved with the conduct of this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of the Peds-MiOncoSeq Clinical Study
Flow chart of all patients who were screened and enrolled in the study. The number of patients with successful sequencing and details specifying the tumor type and tissue site are indicated. Two patients declined participation; for the first patient no tissue was available and the family declined research biopsy, while for second patient, cancer was in remission at the time of screening and family chose not to pursue the study using archived tissue. FFPE = Formalin fixed paraffin embedded. * One solid tumor patient was sequenced twice using frozen tissue, ˆ one solid tumor had both his primary and metastatic tumor site sequenced. + One leukemia patient had both bone marrow and malignant pleural fluid sequenced.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Summary results of the Peds-MiOncoSeq study
A matrix representation of selected informative findings from the sequencing results from the Peds-MiOncoSeq cohort. Patients are characterized on the Y axis according to disease type. Molecular aberrations are indicated on the X axis and grouped according to type. The presence of specific mutations, insertion/deletions, amplification/deletions, and gene fusions are indicated by colored blocks. Color-coding of the blocks is indicated in the legend. Data represented in this figure are derived from all 91 patients with completed whole exome as well as transcriptome sequencing of tumors and exome sequencing of germline DNA. Only sequencing findings with biological significance are included. SNV, single nucleotide variant; indel: insertion/deletion.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium: Accelerating Evidence-Based Practice of Genomic Medicine.
    Green RC, Goddard KAB, Jarvik GP, Amendola LM, Appelbaum PS, Berg JS, Bernhardt BA, Biesecker LG, Biswas S, Blout CL, Bowling KM, Brothers KB, Burke W, Caga-Anan CF, Chinnaiyan AM, Chung WK, Clayton EW, Cooper GM, East K, Evans JP, Fullerton SM, Garraway LA, Garrett JR, Gray SW, Henderson GE, Hindorff LA, Holm IA, Lewis MH, Hutter CM, Janne PA, Joffe S, Kaufman D, Knoppers BM, Koenig BA, Krantz ID, Manolio TA, McCullough L, McEwen J, McGuire A, Muzny D, Myers RM, Nickerson DA, Ou J, Parsons DW, Petersen GM, Plon SE, Rehm HL, Roberts JS, Robinson D, Salama JS, Scollon S, Sharp RR, Shirts B, Spinner NB, Tabor HK, Tarczy-Hornoch P, Veenstra DL, Wagle N, Weck K, Wilfond BS, Wilhelmsen K, Wolf SM, Wynn J, Yu JH; CSER Consortium. Green RC, et al. Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Jun 2;98(6):1051-1066. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 May 12. Am J Hum Genet. 2016. PMID: 27181682 Free PMC article.
  • Recent advances in genetic predisposition to pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
    Bloom M, Maciaszek JL, Clark ME, Pui CH, Nichols KE. Bloom M, et al. Expert Rev Hematol. 2020 Jan;13(1):55-70. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2020.1685866. Epub 2019 Nov 19. Expert Rev Hematol. 2020. PMID: 31657974 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Cascading After Peridiagnostic Cancer Genetic Testing: An Alternative to Population-Based Screening.
    Offit K, Tkachuk KA, Stadler ZK, Walsh MF, Diaz-Zabala H, Levin JD, Steinsnyder Z, Ravichandran V, Sharaf RN, Frey MK, Lipkin SM, Robson ME, Hamilton JG, Vijai J, Mukherjee S. Offit K, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 1;38(13):1398-1408. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02010. Epub 2020 Jan 10. J Clin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31922925 Free PMC article.
  • Pursuing Precision: Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Treatment of Pediatric Solid Tumors.
    Bellantoni AJ, Wagner LM. Bellantoni AJ, et al. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 14;13(14):3531. doi: 10.3390/cancers13143531. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34298746 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Mutation Detection in Patients With Advanced Cancer by Universal Sequencing of Cancer-Related Genes in Tumor and Normal DNA vs Guideline-Based Germline Testing.
    Mandelker D, Zhang L, Kemel Y, Stadler ZK, Joseph V, Zehir A, Pradhan N, Arnold A, Walsh MF, Li Y, Balakrishnan AR, Syed A, Prasad M, Nafa K, Carlo MI, Cadoo KA, Sheehan M, Fleischut MH, Salo-Mullen E, Trottier M, Lipkin SM, Lincoln A, Mukherjee S, Ravichandran V, Cambria R, Galle J, Abida W, Arcila ME, Benayed R, Shah R, Yu K, Bajorin DF, Coleman JA, Leach SD, Lowery MA, Garcia-Aguilar J, Kantoff PW, Sawyers CL, Dickler MN, Saltz L, Motzer RJ, O'Reilly EM, Scher HI, Baselga J, Klimstra DS, Solit DB, Hyman DM, Berger MF, Ladanyi M, Robson ME, Offit K. Mandelker D, et al. JAMA. 2017 Sep 5;318(9):825-835. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11137. JAMA. 2017. PMID: 28873162 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Gaynon PS, Angiolillo AL, Carroll WL, et al. Long-term results of the children’s cancer group studies for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia 1983–2002: a Children’s Oncology Group Report. Leukemia. 2010 Feb;24(2):285–297. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moroz V, Machin D, Faldum A, et al. Changes over three decades in outcome and the prognostic influence of age-at-diagnosis in young patients with neuroblastoma: a report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Project. European journal of cancer. 2011 Mar;47(4):561–571. - PubMed
    1. Thiele CJ, Cohn SL. Genetically InFormed therapies–a “GIFT” for children with cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 May 15;18(10):2735–2739. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pui CH, Carroll WL, Meshinchi S, Arceci RJ. Biology, risk stratification, and therapy of pediatric acute leukemias: an update. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2011 Feb 10;29(5):551–565. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oberlin O, Rey A, Lyden E, et al. Prognostic factors in metastatic rhabdomyosarcomas: results of a pooled analysis from United States and European cooperative groups. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2008 May 10;26(14):2384–2389. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms