Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Sep;32(3):239-48.
doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1556878.

Surveillance Imaging Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Affiliations
Review

Surveillance Imaging Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Nirnimesh Pandey et al. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2015 Sep.

Abstract

There is a significant risk of complication following endovascular abdominal repair (EVAR), including endoleak, graft translocation, thrombosis, and infection. Surveillance imaging is important for detecting EVAR complication. Surveillance modalities include conventional X-ray, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, and conventional angiography, with inherent advantages and drawbacks to each modality. The authors present common complications following EVAR, and recent advances in the key modalities for surveillance.

Keywords: abdominal aortic aneurysm; endoleak; endovascular aneurysm repair; interventional radiology; surveillance imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Drawings illustrating the various types of endoleak: type I, attachment site; type II, collateral vessel; type III, graft failure, type IV, graft porosity. (Reprinted with permission from Agarwal P et al. Multidetector CT of thoracic aortic aneurysms. Radiographics 2009; 29:537–552).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(a) Graft migration with type 1 endoleak (arrow), (b) graft kinking with turbulent flow in lumen, (c) graft kinking with thrombosis of left iliac limb (arrow).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(a) Graft infection with air in the sac (arrow); (b) graft infection with aorto-ureteric fistula and pyelonephritis.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
CTA of EVAR. (a) Misleading high attenuation due to neointimal calcium seen on unenhanced imaging (arrow); (b) true endoleak revealed on delayed imaging (arrow).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
DE-CTA of EVAR. (a) Dose saving from virtual unenhanced reconstruction shown on left; posterior endoleak shown on delayed image on right (arrow). (b) Reduction in coil photon attenuation with monoenergetic beam reconstruction at low (left) and high (right) keV settings.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
MRA maximum intensity projection of EVAR showing kinking in the iliac limbs (arrow).
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Conventional angiography of EVAR. (a) Previously embolized endoleak via translumbar approach shows residual type 2 endoleak supplied via the IMA (circle), here injected through the marginal artery from an SMA approach; (b) successful coil embolization of the IMA with resolution of endoleak (arrow).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Singh K, Bønaa K H, Jacobsen B K, Bjørk L, Solberg S. Prevalence of and risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms in a population-based study: The Tromsø Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154(3):236–244. - PubMed
    1. McPhee J T, Hill J S, Eslami M H. The impact of gender on presentation, therapy, and mortality of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the United States, 2001-2004. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(5):891–899. - PubMed
    1. Parodi J C, Palmaz J C, Barone H D. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 1991;5(6):491–499. - PubMed
    1. Greenhalgh R M Brown L C Kwong G P Powell J T Thompson S G; EVAR trial participants. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial Lancet 20043649437843–848. - PubMed
    1. Schermerhorn M L, O'Malley A J, Jhaveri A, Cotterill P, Pomposelli F, Landon B E. Endovascular vs. open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the Medicare population. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(5):464–474. - PubMed