The Kora Pacemaker is Safe and Effective for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- PMID: 26327785
- PMCID: PMC4536771
- DOI: 10.4137/CMC.S24976
The Kora Pacemaker is Safe and Effective for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract
Background: The impact of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on pacemakers is potentially hazardous. We present clinical results from a novel MRI conditional pacing system with the capability to switch automatically to asynchronous mode in the presence of a strong magnetic field.
Aims: The IKONE (Assessment of the MRI solution: KORA 100™ and Beflex™ pacing leads system) study is an open-label, prospective, multicenter study aimed at confirming the safety and effectiveness of the system, when used in patients undergoing MRI of anatomical regions excluding the chest.
Methods: Primary eligibility criteria included patients implanted with the system, with or without a clinically indicated MRI. The primary endpoint was to confirm no significant change in pacing capture thresholds at 1 month after an MRI, with an absolute difference of ≤0.75 V between the pre- and 1-month post-MRI for both atrial and ventricular capture thresholds.
Results: Out of 33 patients enrolled (mean age: 72.8 ± 11.4 years, 70% male, implant indication or device), 29 patients implanted with the MRI conditional system underwent an MRI 6-8 week postimplant. The study reached its primary endpoint: the mean absolute difference in pacing capture threshold at 1-month post-MRI versus pre-MRI was less than 0.75 V in the atrium (Δ = 0.18 ± 0.16 V, P-value < 0.001) and in the ventricle (Δ = 0.18 ± 0.22 V, P-value < 0.001). There were no adverse events related to the MRI procedure nor were there reports of patient symptoms or discomfort associated. MR image quality was of diagnostic quality in all patients.
Conclusion: Lead electrical performance as measured by difference in capture thresholds were not impacted by MRI. This first clinical evaluation of a novel MRI conditional system demonstrates it is safe and effective for use in out-of-chest, 1.5-T MR imaging.
Keywords: 1.5-T MRI; bradycardia lead; pacemaker.
Similar articles
-
Clinical safety and performance of a MRI conditional pacing system in patients undergoing cardiac MRI.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Dec;40(12):1389-1395. doi: 10.1111/pace.13232. Epub 2017 Dec 5. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017. PMID: 29090491 Clinical Trial.
-
Safety and performance of MR-conditional pacing systems with automated MRI mode at 1.5 and 3 Tesla.Eur Radiol. 2023 Oct;33(10):6948-6958. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09650-9. Epub 2023 May 17. Eur Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37195432 Free PMC article.
-
Randomized trial of pacemaker and lead system for safe scanning at 1.5 Tesla.Heart Rhythm. 2013 May;10(5):685-91. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.01.022. Epub 2013 Jan 17. Heart Rhythm. 2013. PMID: 23333721 Clinical Trial.
-
Joint Position Paper of the Working Group of Pacing and Electrophysiology of the French Society of Cardiology and the French Society of Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac and Vascular Imaging on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac electronic implantable devices.Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Jun-Jul;113(6-7):473-484. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2020.03.015. Epub 2020 May 27. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2020. PMID: 32473997 Review.
-
Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility and safety of the SOUNDTEC Direct System.Laryngoscope. 2006 Aug;116(8):1321-33. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000230479.39551.4a. Laryngoscope. 2006. PMID: 16885731 Review.
Cited by
-
An eight-year prospective controlled study about the safety and diagnostic value of cardiac and non-cardiac 1.5-T MRI in patients with a conventional pacemaker or a conventional implantable cardioverter defibrillator.Eur Radiol. 2018 Jun;28(6):2406-2416. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5098-z. Epub 2018 Jan 9. Eur Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29318430 Clinical Trial.
-
Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: a review of the dangers and difficulties in MR scanning and attempts to improve safety.Insights Imaging. 2017 Aug;8(4):405-418. doi: 10.1007/s13244-017-0556-3. Epub 2017 Jun 17. Insights Imaging. 2017. PMID: 28624970 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Making MRI available for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: growing need and barriers to change.Eur Radiol. 2020 Mar;30(3):1378-1384. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06449-5. Epub 2019 Nov 27. Eur Radiol. 2020. PMID: 31776746 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, et al. 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the task force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Eur Heart J. 2013;34(29):2281–329. - PubMed
-
- Buendía F, Cano Ó, Sánchez-Gómez JM, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T in patients with cardiac rhythm devices. Europace. 2011;13(4):533–8. - PubMed
-
- Buendía F, Sánchez-Gómez JM, Sancho-Tello MJ, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacing devices. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2010;63(6):735–9. - PubMed
-
- Cohen JD, Costa HS, Russo RJ. Determining the risks of magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla for patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110(11):1631–6. - PubMed
-
- Mollerus M, Albin G, Lipinski M, Lucca J. Magnetic resonance imaging of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators without specific absorption rate restrictions. Europace. 2010;12(7):947–51. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources