Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan-Feb;23(1):16-8.
doi: 10.1590/1413-78522015230101026.

Prognostic factors on survival rate of fingers replantation

Affiliations

Prognostic factors on survival rate of fingers replantation

José Queiroz Lima Jr et al. Acta Ortop Bras. 2015 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the factors that influence the survival rate of replantation and revascularization of the thumb and/or fingers.

Methods: We included fifty cases treated in our department from May 2012 to October 2013 with total or partial finger amputations, which had blood perfusion deficit and underwent vascular anastomosis. The parameters evaluated were: age, gender, comorbidities, trauma, time and type of ischemia, mechanism, the injured area, number of anastomosed vessels and use of vein grafts. The results were statistically analyzed and type I error value was set at p <0.05 .

Results: Fifty four percent of the 50 performed replantation survived. Of 15 revascularizations performed, the survival rate was 93.3%. The only factor that affected the survival of the amputated limb was the necessity of venous anastomosis.

Conclusion: We could not establish contraindications or absolute indications for the replantation and revascularization of finger amputations in this study. Level of Evidence III, Retropective Study.

Keywords: Amputation, traumatic; Finger injuries; Replantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All the authors declare that there is no potential conflict of interest referring to this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Mean age of patients.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Mean ischemia times.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Conn JM, Annest JL, Ryan GW, Budnitz DS. Non-work-related finger amputations in the United States, 2001-2002. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;45(6):630–635. - PubMed
    1. Harvey FJ, Harvey PM. A critical review of the results of primary finger and thumb amputations. Hand. 1974;6(2):157–162. - PubMed
    1. Gruneberg R, Spence AJ. Finger amputations and ability to work. Hand. 1974;6(3):236–242. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses--United States, 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56(16):393–397. - PubMed
    1. Barmparas G, Inaba K, Teixeira PG, Dubose JJ, Criscuoli M, Talving P, et al. Epidemiology of post-traumatic limb amputation: a National Trauma Databank analysis. Am Surg. 2010;76(11):1214–1222. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources