Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan-Feb;23(1):38-42.
doi: 10.1590/1413-78522015230100932.

Open fractures and the incidence of infection in the surgical debridement 6 hours after trauma

Affiliations

Open fractures and the incidence of infection in the surgical debridement 6 hours after trauma

Miguel de Castro Fernandes et al. Acta Ortop Bras. 2015 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether a time delay greater than 6h from injury to surgical debridement influences the infection rate in open fractures.

Methods: During a period of 18 months, from October 2010 to March 2012, 151 open fractures were available for study in 142 patients in our hospital. The data were collected prospectively and the patients were followed up for 6 weeks. The patients were divided into two groups regarding the time delay from injury to surgical debridement (more or less than 6 hours).

Results: Surgical debridement was carried out in less than 6h from injury in 90 (59.6%) fractures and after 6 hours from injury in 61 (40.4%) fractures. Infection rates were 12.22% and 13.24%, respectively. The global infection rate was 13.24%.

Conclusion: A significantly increased infection rate was not observed in patients whose surgical debridement occurred more than 6h after injury. However, in the fractures of high-energy trauma, a statistically significant increase of the rate of infection was observed in those operated 6 hours after trauma. Level of Evidence II, Study Type Comparative and Prospective.

Keywords: Debridement; Fractures, open; Infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Todos os autores declaram não haver nenhum potencial conflito de interesses referente a este artigo.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Distribution of compound fractures according to trauma mechanism.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Distribution of compound fractures according to anatomic location.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Distribution of infected compound fractures according to anatomical location.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Distribution of compound fractures according to Gustilo classification.

References

    1. Zalavras CG, Patzakis MJ. Open fractures: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11(3):212–219. - PubMed
    1. Khatod M, Botte MJ, Hoyt DB, Meyer RS, Smith JM, Akeson WH. Outcomes in open tibia fractures: relationship between delay in treatment and infection. J Trauma. 2003;55(5):949–954. - PubMed
    1. Pollak AN, McCarthy ML, Burgess AR. Short-term wound complications after application of flaps for coverage of traumatic soft-tissue defects about the tibia. The Lower Extremity Assessment Project (LEAP) Study Group. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(12):1681–1691. - PubMed
    1. Friedrich PL. Die aseptische Versorgung frischer Wunden. Arch Klin Chir. 1898;57:288–310.
    1. Handley AJ. Basic life support. Br J Anaesth. 1997;79(2):151–158. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources