What are the currently available and in development molecular markers for bladder cancer? Will they prove to be useful in the future?
- PMID: 26328183
- PMCID: PMC4548372
- DOI: 10.5152/tud.2014.60973
What are the currently available and in development molecular markers for bladder cancer? Will they prove to be useful in the future?
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma is the 9(th) most common cancer worldwide. Most urothelial tumors are non-muscle invasive on presentation. However, two-thirds of non-invasive bladder cancers will eventually recur with a 25% risk of progression to muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Tumor stage, histological grade and pathological invasion of blood vessels and lymphatic tissue are the main indicators for urothelial cancer prognosis. The gold standard for diagnosing bladder cancer is conventional white-light cystoscopy and biopsy. Urine cytology is a highly specific, sensitive test for high-grade tumors or carcinoma in situ (CIS). Urinary NMP22 has an overall sensitivity and specificity for detecting bladder cancer of 49% and 87%, respectively. However, there are false-positive results in the presence of urinary tract infection or hematuria. The detection of specific gene mutations related to urothelial cancers has been studied and employed to reproduce markers helpful for diagnosis. According to current studies, molecular markers can be used to predict tumor recurrence. From a prognostic point of view, new molecular markers have yet to be established as reliable indicators of tumor aggressiveness. We aimed to review the molecular markers with possible prognostic significance that have been discussed in the literature. This review examined the literature for various molecular markers under development for bladder cancer in an attempt to optimize patient care and reduce the costs of treating these patients.
Keywords: Bladder cancer; molecular markers; predictor of tumor recurrence.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of urinary nuclear matrix protein-22 and bladder tumour antigen tests with voided urinary cytology in detecting and following bladder cancer: the prognostic value of false-positive results.BJU Int. 2001 Nov;88(7):692-701. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02355.x. BJU Int. 2001. PMID: 11890239
-
Clinical application of NMP22 and urinary cytology in patients with hematuria or a history of urothelial carcinoma.World J Urol. 2000 Dec;18(6):401-5. doi: 10.1007/s003450000124. World J Urol. 2000. PMID: 11204258
-
Comparison of NMP22 BladderChek test and urine cytology for the detection of recurrent bladder cancer.Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2006 Mar;36(3):172-5. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyi244. Epub 2006 Mar 6. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2006. PMID: 16520358
-
Current concepts of tumor markers in bladder cancer.Urol Clin North Am. 2002 Feb;29(1):229-34. doi: 10.1016/s0094-0143(02)00008-3. Urol Clin North Am. 2002. PMID: 12109349 Review.
-
Current bladder tumor tests: does their projected utility fulfill clinical necessity?J Urol. 2001 Apr;165(4):1067-77. J Urol. 2001. PMID: 11257640 Review.
Cited by
-
8-armed octopus: Evaluation of clinicopathologic prognostic factors of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary system.Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Feb 11;49(1):153-161. doi: 10.3906/sag-1805-51. Turk J Med Sci. 2019. PMID: 30764592 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Parkin DM. The global burden of urinary bladder cancer. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2008;218:12–20. - PubMed
-
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71–96. - PubMed
-
- Lopez-Beltran A. Bladder cancer: clinical and pathological profile. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2008;218:95–109. - PubMed
-
- Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA. Campbell-Walsh Urology. USA: Saunders; 2011. pp. 2316–23.
-
- Epstein JI, Amin MB, Reuter VR, Mostofi FK. The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998;22:1435–48. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous