When prostate cancer remains undetectable: The dilemma
- PMID: 26328196
- PMCID: PMC4548656
- DOI: 10.5152/tud.2015.91249
When prostate cancer remains undetectable: The dilemma
Abstract
Since the first report on the efficacy of sextant biopsy under transrectal ultrasound guidance, there have been many modifications related to the total number of cores and the localization of biopsies to improve the prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate. The 2010 National Comprehensive Cancer Network Early PCa Detection Guidelines noted the 12-core biopsy scheme as the standard. However, this extended biopsy scheme still fails to detect 20% of high-grade PCa that can be detected by detailed pathological evaluation of radical prostatectomy; therefore, there is need for saturation biopsies. The existence of suspicions of PCa after previous negative biopsy or biopsies represents a valid indication for saturation biopsy. There has been no significant increment in morbidity or in insignificant PCa detection rates when a saturation biopsy scheme was used with an extended biopsy scheme. Along with the improvement in the PCa detection rate, accurate oncological mapping of PCa is another important consideration of saturation biopsies. The ideal number of cores and the diagnostic value of saturation biopsy after the failure of initial therapy are some of the issues that need to be addressed. Preliminary reports have shown that magnetic resonance imaging can improve the PCa detection rate, save patients from unnecessary biopsies, and decrease the need for a high number of cores; however, multiple limitations continue to exist.
Keywords: Prostate; prostate biopsy; prostate cancer.
Similar articles
-
Prospective evaluation of an extended 21-core biopsy scheme as initial prostate cancer diagnostic strategy.Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):154-61. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.049. Epub 2012 Jun 9. Eur Urol. 2014. PMID: 22698576 Clinical Trial.
-
Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jun 1;59(2):386-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.014. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004. PMID: 15145152
-
Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.Eur Urol. 2014 Jul;66(1):22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Mar 14. Eur Urol. 2014. PMID: 24666839
-
Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.Dan Med J. 2017 Feb;64(2):B5327. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 28157066 Review.
-
An update on prostate biopsy in the era of magnetic resonance imaging.Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2018 Jun;70(3):264-274. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.18.03048-5. Epub 2018 Mar 28. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2018. PMID: 29595039 Review.
References
-
- Watanabe H, Kato H, Kato T, Morita M, Tanaka M. Diagnostic application of ultrasonotomography to the prostate. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 1968;59:273–9. - PubMed
-
- Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol. 1989;142:71–4. - PubMed
-
- Cooner WH, Mosley BR, Rutherford CL, Jr, Beard JH, Pond HS, Bass RB, Jr, et al. Clinical application of transrectal ultrasonography and prostate specific antigen in the search for prostate cancer. J Urol. 1988;139:758–61. - PubMed
-
- Shinohara K, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT. The appearance of prostate cancer on transrectal ultrasonography: correlation of imaging and pathological examinations. J Urol. 1989;142:76–82. - PubMed
-
- Stamey TA. Making the most out of six systematic sextant biopsies. Urology. 1995;45:2–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(95)96168-2. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources