Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 May;24(5):626-32.
doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.191. Epub 2015 Sep 2.

Health professionals' opinions on supporting a cancer biobank: identification of barriers to combat biobanking pitfalls

Affiliations
Review

Health professionals' opinions on supporting a cancer biobank: identification of barriers to combat biobanking pitfalls

Nicole J Caixeiro et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 May.

Abstract

Although rarely acknowledged, a successful biobank is highly dependent on the support of the health professionals who assist the biobank in all aspects of its activities. In many cases, the lack of health professional support can be a limiting factor in the biobanking process of collecting and processing high-quality biospecimens. The aim of this study was to determine the attitudes of health professionals towards cancer biobanking. Using a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire, important aspects of biobanking, including accrual, quality, knowledge, responsiveness, impact, access, trust, governance and accreditation, were investigated. In total, 95 of 124 health and medical practitioners who were approached participated in this study (77% response rate). Health professionals in general supported the aims of biobanking with 56% of participants showing willingness to create a biobank and recruit donors (accrual), 85% understanding the importance in the storage and distribution of biospecimens (quality), 88% having an appreciation for the role of a biobank in furthering cancer research (knowledge), 70% showing awareness of the use of biospecimens in future research initiatives (responsiveness) and 73% demonstrating support for a biobank with proper control, authority and credibility measures in place (governance and accreditation). Overall, provided that proper information about the activities of the biobank and researcher access was transparent, health professionals were very willing to support cancer biobanking. These findings may assist in developing strategies for the establishment and maintenance of biobanks and aid the implementation of more effective policies and procedures to embed biobanking into routine hospital practices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barnes RO, Parisien M, Murphy LC, Watson PH: Influence of evolution in tumor biobanking on the interpretation of translational research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008; 17: 3344–3350. - PubMed
    1. Otlowski MFA, Nicol D, Stranger MJA: Biobanks information paper 2010. J Law Info Sci 2010; 20: 97–227.
    1. Riegman PH, Morente MM, Betsou F, de Blasio P, Geary P, Marble Arch International Working Group on Biobanking for Biomedical Research: Biobanking for better healthcare. Mol Oncol 2008; 2: 213–222. - PubMed
    1. Wyld L, Smith S, Hawkins NJ, Long J, Ward RL: Introducing research initiatives into healthcare: what do doctors think? Biopreserv Biobank 2014; 12: 91–98. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nicol D, Critchley C: Benefit sharing and biobanking in Australia. Public Underst Sci 2012; 21: 534–555. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources