Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Sep 2:15:101.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0068-9.

The effect of motivational interviewing on oral healthcare knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of parents and caregivers of preschool children: an exploratory cluster randomised controlled study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The effect of motivational interviewing on oral healthcare knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of parents and caregivers of preschool children: an exploratory cluster randomised controlled study

Rahul Naidu et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: Motivational Interviewing (MI) has been used across primary healthcare and been shown to be effective in reducing the prevalence of early childhood caries (ECC) in preschool children. This study aimed to compare the effect of MI, in contrast to traditional dental health education (DHE), on oral health knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours among parents and caregivers of preschool children in Trinidad.

Method: The design of this exploratory study included a cluster randomised controlled trial and semi-structured focus groups. Six preschools (79 parents and caregivers) in Eastern Trinidad were randomly assigned to a test or control group (3 preschools in each group). Parents and caregivers in the test-group (n = 25) received a talk on dental health using an MI approach and the control-group (n = 54) received a talk using traditional DHE. Both groups received additional, written dental health information. The MI group also received two telephone call follow-ups as part of the MI protocol. Both groups were given questionnaires before the talks and four months later. Question items included oral health knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, brushing behaviour, oral health self-efficacy, oral health fatalism and a specific instrument to asses 'readiness for change', the Readiness Assessment of Parents Concerning Infant Dental Decay (RAPIDD). Participants in the test-group were also invited to take part in a focus group to share their views on the dental health talk.

Results: At four month follow-up, knowledge items on fluoride use, tooth brushing, dietary practice and dental attendance increased in both the test (DHE + MI) and control (DHE) groups ((p < 0.05, Chi Square test). In the test-group there were increases in mean child tooth brushing frequency and reduction in oral health fatalism (p < 0.05 t-test). Findings from a thematic analysis of the focus group suggested that the MI talk and telephone follow-up were well accepted and helpful in supporting parent and caregiver efforts to improve oral health practices for their preschool children.

Conclusion: In this exploratory controlled study there was some evidence that using an MI approach when delivering oral health information had a positive effect on parent/ caregiver oral health knowledge, attitudes and behaviours compared to traditional DHE. There is need for further research involving the use of brief-counselling techniques in this Caribbean population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Response to the study

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tinanoff N, Daley NS, O-Sullivan DM, Douglass JM. Failure of intense preventive efforts to arrest early childhood and rampant caries: three case reports. Paed Dent. 1999;21:160–163. - PubMed
    1. Weinstein P. Motivational interviewing concepts and the relationship to risk management and patient counselling. J Cal Dent Association. 2011;39:742–745. - PubMed
    1. Yevlahova D, Satur J. Models for individual oral health promotion and their effectiveness: a systematic review. Austr Dent J. 2009;54:190–197. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01118.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ramos-Gomez F, Crystal YO, Domejean S, Featherstone JDB. Minimal intervention dentistry: part 3. Paediatric dental care - prevention and intervention protocols using caries risk assessment for infants and young children. Br Dent J. 2012;213:501–508. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.1040. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Noordman J, van der Weijden T, van Dulman S. Communication-related behaviour change techniques used in face-to-face lifestyle interventions in primary care: A systematic review of the literature. Patient Ed Counselling. 2012;89:227–244. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.07.006. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms