Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Dec;24(12):3870-3876.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3774-6. Epub 2015 Sep 2.

Combined SLAP repair and biceps tenodesis for superior labral anterior-posterior tears

Peter N Chalmers  1 , Brett Monson  2 , Rachel M Frank  2 , Randy Mascarenhas  2 , Gregory P Nicholson  2 , Bernard R Bach Jr  2 , Nikhil N Verma  2 , Brian J Cole  2 , Anthony A Romeo  2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Combined SLAP repair and biceps tenodesis for superior labral anterior-posterior tears

Peter N Chalmers et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: Long-head biceps tenodesis has been suggested as an alternative to superior labral anterior-posterior (SLAP) repair. However, an unrepaired superior labral tear may increase glenohumeral translation, and thus, labral repair may be considered in the setting of biceps tenodesis.

Methods: Patients who underwent tenodesis, SLAP repair, or combined tenodesis and labral repair for SLAP tears were included. The indication for combined tenodesis and labral repair was biceps tendonitis in the setting of a SLAP lesion with labral instability. Demographics, range of motion, return to work, return to sport, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and visual analogue pain scale (VAS) scores were recorded.

Results: Eighty-six patients were included: 18 underwent combined tenodesis and labral repair, 45 underwent SLAP repair alone, and 23 underwent tenodesis alone. There were no significant differences in rates of return to pre-operative level of play (n.s.) or return to full duties at work (n.s.). These groups differed significantly in ASES scores (p = 0.015) and VAS scores (p = 0.019) with combined tenodesis and labral repair patients having lower scores than patients undergoing either tenodesis or SLAP repair alone. A subgroup analysis of patients who did not have Worker's Compensation claims demonstrated similar results with significant differences in ASES scores, which were lowest among the combined tenodesis and labral repair cohort (p = 0.045).

Conclusions: High-demand patients with biceps tendonitis in the setting of a SLAP lesion with labral instability who undergo combined tenodesis and SLAP repair have significantly worse outcomes than patients who undergo either isolated labral repair for type II SLAP tears or isolated biceps tenodesis for a SLAP tear and biceps tendonitis.

Level of evidence: Treatment, Level III.

Keywords: Biceps tenodesis; Return to play; Superior labral anterior–posterior tears; Worker’s Compensation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Jan;78(1):94-102 - PubMed
    1. Orthopedics. 2014 Mar;37(3):e292-7 - PubMed
    1. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Nov;21(11):1580-7 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jul;87(7):1580-3 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jan;85-A(1):66-71 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources