Observational, prospective, multicentre study to evaluate the effects of counselling on the choice of combined hormonal contraceptives in Italy--the ECOS (Educational COunselling effectS) study
- PMID: 26329464
- PMCID: PMC4557636
- DOI: 10.1186/s12905-015-0226-x
Observational, prospective, multicentre study to evaluate the effects of counselling on the choice of combined hormonal contraceptives in Italy--the ECOS (Educational COunselling effectS) study
Abstract
Background: Adequate counselling on contraceptive methods can help users choose the most appropriate method. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of structured counselling provided by gynaecologists on selection of a combined hormonal contraception method.
Methods: Women aged 18-40 years (n = 1871) who were considering the use of a combined hormonal contraception method (pill, transdermal patch or vaginal ring) underwent a structured counselling session in which gynaecologists provided comprehensive information. Pre- and post-counselling questionnaires on combined hormonal contraception choice were completed by participants.
Results: After counselling, many women (38 %) selected a combined hormonal contraception method that was different from the originally intended one. Preferences for the transdermal patch approximately doubled (from 3.2 % pre-counselling to 7 %; p < 0.0001) and those for the vaginal ring increased four-fold (from 5.2 to 21.2 %; p < 0.0001), while preference for the pill remained unchanged (from 64.5 % [pre-] to 64.1 % [post-counselling]). The proportion of undecided women decreased from 18 to 2.1 % (p < 0.0001). The main reasons for choosing a method were related to ease of use (all methods), and preferences for administration frequency (daily, weekly or monthly). The number of patients requiring post-counselling contact with the physician's office was low (5.1-6.9 %), as was the incidence of adverse events (1.8-3.1 %).
Conclusions: Counselling has a significant impact on women's choice of combined hormonal contraception and encourages them to consider alternative methods to combined oral contraceptives. Moreover, it also enables women to use their chosen method with confidence.
Trial registration: NCT01181778 , Trial registration date: August 12, 2010.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Contraceptive counselling and factors affecting women's contraceptive choices: results of the CHOICE study in Austria.Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Jun;24(7):692-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.12.003. Epub 2011 Dec 16. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012. PMID: 22285247
-
Broad counseling for adolescents about combined hormonal contraceptive methods: the choice study.J Adolesc Health. 2014 Apr;54(4):404-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.06.019. Epub 2013 Aug 9. J Adolesc Health. 2014. PMID: 23932259
-
The CHOICE study: effect of counselling on the selection of combined hormonal contraceptive methods in 11 countries.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2012 Feb;17(1):65-78. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2011.637586. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2012. PMID: 22239264
-
Nondaily hormonal contraception: considerations in contraceptive choice and patient counseling.J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2004 Jun;16(6):226-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2004.tb00444.x. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2004. PMID: 15264608 Review.
-
Contraception - common issues and practical suggestions.Aust Fam Physician. 2012 Oct;41(10):770-2. Aust Fam Physician. 2012. PMID: 23210098 Review.
Cited by
-
Values and preferences for contraception: A global systematic review.Contraception. 2022 Jul;111:3-21. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.04.011. Epub 2022 May 4. Contraception. 2022. PMID: 35525287 Free PMC article.
-
Awareness of risk when prescribing and taking combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs): a qualitative study with women and health professionals in three European countries.BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):e084735. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084735. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 40032391 Free PMC article.
-
Reasons for hormonal contraceptive use in a cohort of African-American women living in the Detroit area.Contraception. 2020 Nov;102(5):346-348. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.07.093. Epub 2020 Aug 6. Contraception. 2020. PMID: 32768397 Free PMC article.
-
Pill, patch or ring? A mixed methods analysis of provider counseling about combined hormonal contraception.Contraception. 2019 Feb;99(2):104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 15. Contraception. 2019. PMID: 30227121 Free PMC article.
References
-
- WHO The reproductive health report: The state of sexual and reproductive health within the European Union. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2011;16(Suppl 1):S1–S70. - PubMed
-
- United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Contraceptive Use 2011: http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/contraceptive2011/wallchar....
-
- Mosher WD, Jones J. Use of contraception in the United States: 1982–2008. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 2010;23(29):1–44. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical