Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016;16(10):1154-66.
doi: 10.2174/1568026615666150902102143.

HIV-1 Gag as an Antiviral Target: Development of Assembly and Maturation Inhibitors

Affiliations
Review

HIV-1 Gag as an Antiviral Target: Development of Assembly and Maturation Inhibitors

Paul Spearman. Curr Top Med Chem. 2016.

Abstract

HIV-1 Gag is the master orchestrator of particle assembly. The central role of Gag at multiple stages of the HIV lifecycle has led to efforts to develop drugs that directly target Gag and prevent the formation and release of infectious particles. Until recently, however, only the catalytic site protease inhibitors have been available to inhibit late stages of HIV replication. This review summarizes the current state of development of antivirals that target Gag or disrupt late events in the retrovirus lifecycle such as maturation of the viral capsid. Maturation inhibitors represent an exciting new series of antiviral compounds, including those that specifically target CA-SP1 cleavage and the allosteric integrase inhibitors that inhibit maturation by a completely different mechanism. Numerous small molecules and peptides targeting CA have been studied in attempts to disrupt steps in assembly. Efforts to target CA have recently gained considerable momentum from the development of small molecules that bind CA and alter capsid stability at the post-entry stage of the lifecycle. Efforts to develop antivirals that inhibit incorporation of genomic RNA or to inhibit late budding events remain in preliminary stages of development. Overall, the development of novel antivirals targeting Gag and the late stages in HIV replication appears much closer to success than ever, with the new maturation inhibitors leading the way.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author confirms that he has no conflict of interest with the content of this review.

Figures

Fig. (1)
Fig. (1). HIV-1 Gag and Basics of Particle Assembly
The HIV Gag polyprotein is represented at the top of the figure, using structures of individual regions of the protein. Proteolytic cleavage sites are indicated by red arrows. The structures represented are from [, –161] with PDB IDs from N- to C-terminus: 2HMX (MA), 2GOL (CA NTD), 1A8O (CA CTD), 1U57 (SP1), 1F6U (NC). Structures were prepared using CN3d version 4.3. Below a cell is represented to illustrate Gag protein formation on cytosolic ribosomes and assembly and budding at the plasma membrane. The process of maturation of the core occurs during or immediately following particle budding.
Fig. (2)
Fig. (2). Distinct mechanism of action of maturation inhibitors
Bevirimat (top) inhibits CA-SP1 cleavage, binding to a pocket that is not fully elucidated but includes key residues in SP1 and in the CA CTD surrounding the CA-SP1 cleavage site. MHR = major homology region. Disruption of CA-SP1 cleavage results in aberrant particle formation with a membrane crescent of Gag and an acentric core. The ALLINIs act by a very distinct mechanism, binding to the LEDGF binding region at the dimer interface of the IN catalytic core domains (CCDs) and promoting aberrant multimerization. Particles treated with these inhibitors display a displaced density (presumably the viral RNA) and an empty core. Structures shown are from [51, 105, 161] with PDB IDs of 4USN (CA), 1U57 (SP1), and 4GW6 (IN + ALLINI).
Fig. (3)
Fig. (3). CA inhibitors and binding pockets
Binding sites for distinct inhibitors are shown. A) CAP-1 binding pocket on the CA NTD. B) Benzodiazepine (BD) inhibitor is shown also binding in the CAP-1 binding pocket of the NTD; note the NTD orientation is changed from (A) to emphasize the inhibitor binding pocket. C) CAI is a peptide binding to an interface on the CA CTD. D) PF74 binds to a distinct pocket on the CA NTD; orientation of the NTD is similar to that shown in (A). Structures are from [, , –163] with PDB IDs of 2JPR (CAP-1), 4E91 (BD), 3DS1 (CAI), and 2XDE (PF74).

References

    1. Palmisano L, Vella S. A brief history of antiretroviral therapy of HIV infection: success and challenges. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2011;47(1):44–8. - PubMed
    1. Bocanegra R, Rodriguez-Huete A, Fuertes MA, Del Alamo M, Mateu MG. Molecular recognition in the human immunodeficiency virus capsid and antiviral design. Virus Res. 2012;169(2):388–410. - PubMed
    1. Jiang Y, Liu X, De Clercq E. New therapeutic approaches targeted at the late stages of the HIV-1 replication cycle. Curr Med Chem. 2011;18(1):16–28. - PubMed
    1. Prevelige PE., Jr New approaches for antiviral targeting of HIV assembly. J Mol Biol. 2011;410(4):634–40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Waheed AA, Freed EO. HIV type 1 Gag as a target for antiviral therapy. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2012;28(1):54–75. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms