Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Oct;64(10):740-6.
doi: 10.1007/s00101-015-0077-8. Epub 2015 Sep 2.

Comparison between dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusion in emergence agitation during recovery after nasal surgery: A randomized double-blind trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison between dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusion in emergence agitation during recovery after nasal surgery: A randomized double-blind trial

R Polat et al. Anaesthesist. 2015 Oct.

Retraction in

Expression of concern in

Abstract

Background: Postoperative emergency agitation (EA) is a common problem. Dexmedetomidine and remifentanil may be used to prevent this problem. Our primary aim was to compare dexmedetomidine, remifentanil, and placebo with respect to their effectiveness in preventing postoperative EA.

Material and methods: Ninety patients undergoing nasal surgery were randomized into three groups. The dexmedetomidine group (group D, n = 30) received dexmedetomidine infusion at a rate of 0.4 μg kg(-1 ) h(-1); the remifentanil group (group R, n = 30) received remifentanil infusion at a rate of 0.05 μg kg(-1) min(-1) from induction of anesthesia until extubation; and the control group (group S, n = 30) received a volume-matched normal saline infusion as a placebo. Propofol (1.5-2 mg kg(-1)) and fentanyl (1 μg kg(-1)) were used to initiate anesthesia, and desflurane was used to maintain anesthesia. The incidence of agitation, hemodynamic parameters, and recovery characteristics were evaluated during emergence.

Results: The incidence of EA was significantly higher in group S (46.7%) compared with groups R and D (3.3 and 20%, respectively; p < 0.001). The lowest incidence of EA was detected in group R (p = 0.046). Residual sedation in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) was similar in all groups (p = 0.947). The incidence of nausea or vomiting was significantly lower in group D than in groups R and S (p = 0.043). Administration of analgesics in the PACU was higher in group R than in groups S and D (p = 0.015).

Conclusion: Anesthetic maintenance with either remifentanil or dexmedetomidine infusion until extubation provided a more smooth and hemodynamically stable emergence, without complications after nasal surgery. While remifentanil was superior to dexmedetomidine with regard to avoiding EA, dexmedetomidine was more effective than remifentanil regarding vomiting and pain.

Keywords: Anesthesia; Dexmedetomidine; Emergence agitation; Nasal surgery; Remifentanil.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anesth Analg. 1999 Jan;88(1):134-40 - PubMed
    1. Anesthesiology. 2000 Aug;93(2):409-17 - PubMed
    1. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003 Oct;17(5):576-84 - PubMed
    1. Anesth Analg. 2009 Apr;108(4):1157-60 - PubMed
    1. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005 Sep;15(9):762-6 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources