Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep;10(3):522-8.
doi: 10.1007/s11552-014-9731-x.

The use of an iPad to collect patient-reported functional outcome measures in hand surgery

Mark Yaffe  1 , Nitin Goyal  2 , Daniel Kokmeyer  3 , Gregory A Merrell  3
Affiliations

The use of an iPad to collect patient-reported functional outcome measures in hand surgery

Mark Yaffe et al. Hand (N Y). 2015 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate (1) patient preferences regarding iPad and paper-based questionnaires, (2) the efficacy of iPad and paper questionnaires in a hand surgery practice, (3) the influence of questionnaire length on patient preferences and data collection, and (4) patient characteristics associated with a preference for iPad-based questionnaires.

Methods: Two hundred total patients in a single hand surgery practice were randomly assigned to one of four groups. Each group completed either the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ) or QuickDASH (QD) using either an iPad or pen and paper. Patient preferences, questionnaire completion and timing, and demographic data were analyzed.

Results: The use of an iPad was associated with a statistically stronger preference for the same delivery format in the future compared to paper for the MHQ (93.9 vs 52.1 %, p < 0.001) and QD (90.0 vs 41.7 %, p < 0.001). The MHQ iPad group found the survey "physically easy" more often compared to the MHQ paper group, while no difference was found among QD groups. Questionnaire timing between iPad and paper groups was similar for the MHQ but statistically longer with the iPad for QD. A significantly higher proportion of patients who preferred the iPad were under the age of 50 compared to those who preferred paper.

Conclusions: The addition of an iPad is an efficient and preferable questionnaire format for functional outcome assessment in a hand and upper extremity surgery practice setting. The iPad is particularly preferable for longer outcome questionnaires and for patients under the age of 50.

Keywords: Functional outcomes; Hand surgery; Patient reported outcomes; iPad.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Interface of traditional pen and paper (top) and iPad (bottom) questionnaires
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Age distribution of patients preferring paper vs iPad
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Paper questionnaire showing multiple responses
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Patient with K-wires attempting to complete paper questionnaire
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Giladi AM, Chung KC. Measuring outcomes in hand surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2013;40(2):313–22. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2012.10.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chernew ME, Rosen AB, Fendrick AM. Value-based insurance design. Health Affair. 2007;26(2):w195–203. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.w195. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boyce MB, Browne JP, Greenhalgh J. The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(6):508–18. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002524. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lane SJ, Heddle NM, Arnold E, Walker I. A review of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of hand held computers with paper methods for data collection. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006;6:23. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-6-23. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dy CJ, Schmicker T, Tran Q, Chadwick B, Daluiski A. The use of a tablet computer to complete the DASH questionnaire. J Hand Surg. 2012;37(12):2589–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.09.010. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources