The knowledge value-chain of genetic counseling for breast cancer: an empirical assessment of prediction and communication processes
- PMID: 26334522
- DOI: 10.1007/s10689-015-9835-7
The knowledge value-chain of genetic counseling for breast cancer: an empirical assessment of prediction and communication processes
Abstract
The aim of this paper is twofold: to analyze the genetic counseling process for breast cancer with a theoretical knowledge transfer lens and to compare generalists, medical specialists, and genetic counselors with regards to their genetic counseling practices. This paper presents the genetic counseling process occurring within a chain of value-adding activities of four main stages describing health professionals' clinical practices: (1) evaluation, (2) investigation, (3) information, and (4) decision. It also presents the results of a cross-sectional study based on a Canadian medical doctors and genetic counselors survey (n = 176) realized between July 2012 and March 2013. The statistical exercise included descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA and post-hoc tests. The results indicate that even though all types of health professionals are involved in the entire process of genetic counseling for breast cancer, genetic counselors are more involved in the evaluation of breast cancer risk, while medical doctors are more active in the decision toward breast cancer risk management strategies. The results secondly demonstrate the relevance and the key role of genetic counselors in the care provided to women at-risk of familial breast cancer. This paper presents an integrative framework to understand the current process of genetic counseling for breast cancer in Canada, and to shed light on how and where health professionals contribute to the process. It also offers a starting point for assessing clinical practices in genetic counseling in order to establish more clearly where and to what extent efforts should be undertaken to implement future genetic services.
Keywords: Canadian health care providers; Familial breast cancer; Genetic counseling; Knowledge management; Knowledge value chain; Risk communication; Risk prediction.
Similar articles
-
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11. J Clin Oncol. 2003. PMID: 12692171
-
A survey of genetic counselors about the needs of 18-25 year olds from families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.J Genet Couns. 2015 Feb;24(1):78-87. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9739-y. Epub 2014 Jul 12. J Genet Couns. 2015. PMID: 25011978
-
Use of an educational computer program before genetic counseling for breast cancer susceptibility: effects on duration and content of counseling sessions.Genet Med. 2005 Apr;7(4):221-9. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000159905.13125.86. Genet Med. 2005. PMID: 15834239 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Genetic counseling, testing, and screening for breast and ovarian cancer: practical and social considerations.Curr Womens Health Rep. 2002 Jun;2(3):163-9. Curr Womens Health Rep. 2002. PMID: 12099190 Review.
-
A systematic review of communication interventions to help healthcare professionals discuss genetic testing for breast cancer.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Aug;183(1):9-21. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05741-z. Epub 2020 Jun 23. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020. PMID: 32577939 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Toward a Population-Based Breast Cancer Risk Stratification Approach? The Needs and Concerns of Healthcare Providers.J Pers Med. 2021 Jun 10;11(6):540. doi: 10.3390/jpm11060540. J Pers Med. 2021. PMID: 34200634 Free PMC article.
-
Disentangling the determinants of interest and willingness-to-pay for breast cancer susceptibility testing in the general population: a cross-sectional Web-based survey among women of Québec (Canada).BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 27;8(2):e016662. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016662. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 29487071 Free PMC article.
-
Primary care providers' cancer genetic testing-related knowledge, attitudes, and communication behaviors: A systematic review and research agenda.J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Mar;32(3):315-324. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3943-4. Epub 2016 Dec 19. J Gen Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 27995427 Free PMC article.
-
Clinicians' use of breast cancer risk assessment tools according to their perceived importance of breast cancer risk factors: an international survey.J Community Genet. 2019 Jan;10(1):61-71. doi: 10.1007/s12687-018-0362-8. Epub 2018 Mar 5. J Community Genet. 2019. PMID: 29508368 Free PMC article.
-
The composition and capacity of the clinical genetics workforce in high-income countries: a scoping review.Genet Med. 2020 Sep;22(9):1437-1449. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0825-2. Epub 2020 Jun 24. Genet Med. 2020. PMID: 32576987
References
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical