Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Apr;39(4):401-9.
doi: 10.1007/s40618-015-0378-4. Epub 2015 Sep 3.

Bringing the body of the iceberg to the surface: the Female Sexual Dysfunction Index-6 (FSDI-6) in the screening of female sexual dysfunction

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Bringing the body of the iceberg to the surface: the Female Sexual Dysfunction Index-6 (FSDI-6) in the screening of female sexual dysfunction

E Maseroli et al. J Endocrinol Invest. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: Female Sexual Dysfunction (FSD) is a still poorly studied and underdiagnosed condition. The aim of the study was to produce an improved version of FSFI-6 (6-Item Version of the Female Sexual Function Index), entitled Female Sexual Dysfunction Index-6 (FSDI-6), and to estimate its accuracy as a screening instrument for FSD.

Methods: In the new version, an item related to the personal interest in having a satisfying sex life was added, while the item rating the entity of sexual arousal was removed. We administered FSDI-6 in a consecutive series of female adult patients not consulting for sexual problems (n = 120, Cohort 1), and in another series of patients specifically consulting for sexual problems, which were considered as the control group (n = 160, Cohort 2).

Results: FSDI-6 score was significantly higher in patients in Cohort 2 (p < 0.0001). Cronbach's alpha for FSDI-6 was 0.784, indicating a high level of reliability. The estimated area under the ROC curve for FSDI-6 was 0.657 (p < 0.0001, 95 % CI 0.584-0.730). The proportion of subjects with a pathological FSDI-6 score (≥16.5) was 29.9 (n = 32) and 59.4 % (n = 95) in Cohort 1 and 2, respectively (p < 0.0001). Among subjects with a pathological FSDI-6 (score ≥16.5), those consulting for FSD had been postmenopausal for fewer years, had a higher level of education, a lower BMI and a lower prevalence of chronic diseases than those not consulting for FSD (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Although a lower educational level, overweight/obesity, menopause and chronic diseases are risk factors for FSD, they are often associated with the failure in medical consultation for FSD. We propose that FSDI-6 should be performed by health care providers in non-specialist settings to detect potential FSD, which otherwise could remain under-diagnosed.

Keywords: Female sexual dysfunction; Questionnaire; Referral; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Sex Med. 2010 Mar;7(3):1139-46 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1999 Feb 10;281(6):537-44 - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2014 Mar 06;7:95-105 - PubMed
    1. Eur Urol. 2006 Jul;50(1):44-52 - PubMed
    1. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2014 Jan;47(1):1-6 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources