Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Sep 3:13:209.
doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0446-9.

The broader economic impact of vaccination: reviewing and appraising the strength of evidence

Affiliations
Review

The broader economic impact of vaccination: reviewing and appraising the strength of evidence

Mark Jit et al. BMC Med. .

Abstract

Background: Microeconomic evaluations of public health programmes such as immunisation typically only consider direct health benefits and medical cost savings. Broader economic benefits around childhood development, household behaviour, and macro-economic indicators are increasingly important, but the evidence linking immunization to such benefits is unclear.

Methods: A conceptual framework of pathways between immunisation and its proposed broader economic benefits was developed through expert consultation. Relevant articles were obtained from previous reviews, snowballing, and expert consultation. Articles were associated with one of the pathways and quality assessed using modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria.

Results: We found 20 studies directly relevant to one or more pathways. Evidence of moderate quality from experimental and observational studies was found for benefits due to immunisation in improved childhood physical development, educational outcomes, and equity in distribution of health gains. Only modelling evidence or evidence outside the immunization field supports extrapolating these benefits to household economic behaviour and macro-economic indicators.

Conclusion: Innovative use of experimental and observational study designs is needed to fill evidence gaps around key pathways between immunisation and many of its proposed economic benefits.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A conceptual framework for pathways to the broader economic impact of vaccines. Boxes are shaded in colours corresponding to different major categories in Table 1

References

    1. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Development assistance for health, country and regional recipient level database 1990–2010. http://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/development-assistance-health-country-.... Accessed on 20 August 2015.
    1. Plotkin SA. Vaccines: past, present and future. Nat Med. 2005;11:S5–S11. doi: 10.1038/nm1209. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leach-Kemon K, Graves CM, Johnson EK, Lavado RF, Hanlon M, Haakenstad A. Vaccine resource tracking systems. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:421. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-421. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim S-Y, Goldie SJ. Cost-effectiveness analyses of vaccination programmes: a focused review of modelling approaches. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26:191–215. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826030-00004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bloom DE, Canning D, Jamison DT. Health, wealth, and welfare. Finance Dev. 2004;41:10–5.

Publication types