Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr;23(e1):e162-8.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv114. Epub 2015 Sep 2.

What do we know about developing patient portals? a systematic literature review

Terese Otte-Trojel  1 , Antoinette de Bont  2 , Thomas G Rundall  3 , Joris van de Klundert  2
Affiliations

What do we know about developing patient portals? a systematic literature review

Terese Otte-Trojel et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: Numerous articles have reported on the development of patient portals, including development problems and solutions. We review these articles to inform future patient portal development efforts and to provide a summary of the evidence base that can guide future research.

Materials and methods: We performed a systematic review of relevant literature to answer 5 questions: (1) What categories of problems related to patient portal development have been defined? (2) What causal factors have been identified by problem analysis and diagnosis? (3) What solutions have been proposed to ameliorate these causal factors? (4) Which proposed solutions have been implemented and in which organizational contexts? (5) Have implemented solutions been evaluated and what learning has been generated? Through searches on PubMed, ScienceDirect and LISTA, we included 109 articles.

Results: We identified 5 main problem categories: achieving patient engagement, provider engagement, appropriate data governance, security and interoperability, and a sustainable business model. Further, we identified key factors contributing to these problems as well as solutions proposed to ameliorate them. While about half (45) of the 109 articles proposed solutions, fewer than half of these solutions (18) were implemented, and even fewer (5) were evaluated to generate learning about their effects.

Discussion: Few studies systematically report on the patient portal development processes. As a result, the review does not provide an evidence base for portal development.

Conclusion: Our findings support a set of recommendations for advancement of the evidence base: future research should build on existing evidence, draw on principles from design sciences conveyed in the problem-solving cycle, and seek to produce evidence within various different organizational contexts.

Keywords: design and development; design sciences; patient portals; personal health records; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
The problem-solving cycle. Adapted from the model of Van Aken et al (2012).
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Aligning Forces for Quality. Lessons Learned. The Value of Personal Health Records and Web Portals to Engage Consumers and Improve Quality 2012. http://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/issue_briefs/2012/rwjf400251. Published July 2012 (accessed 5 Sept 2013).
    1. Detmer D, Bloomrosen M, Raymond B, et al. Integrated personal health records: transformative tools for consumer-centric care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008;8:45. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Otte-Trojel T, de Bont A, Rundall T, et al. How outcomes are achieved through patient portals: a realist review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014;21(4):751–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goldzweig CL, Towfigh AA, Paige NM, et al. Systematic review: secure messaging between providers and patients, and patients’ access to their own medical record. Evidence on Health Outcomes, Satisfaction, Efficiency and Attitudes. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK100359/pdf/TOC.pdf. VA-ESP Project #05-226, 2012. Published July 2012 (accessed 22 Feb 2015).
    1. Ammenwerth E, Schnell-Inderst P, Hoerbst A. The impact of electronic patient portals on patient care: a systematic review of controlled trials. J Med Internet Res 2012;14(6):e162. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms