Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep 3;10(9):e0136759.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136759. eCollection 2015.

Psychometric Properties of the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Instrument in Singapore

Kavita Venkataraman  1 , Luor Shyuan Maudrene Tan  1 , Dianne Carrol Tan Bautista  2 , Konstadina Griva  3 , Yasmin Laura Marie Zuniga  4 , Mohamed Amir  3 , Yung Seng Lee  5 , Jeannette Lee  1 , E Shyong Tai  6 , Eric Yin Hao Khoo  4 , Hwee Lin Wee  7
Affiliations

Psychometric Properties of the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Instrument in Singapore

Kavita Venkataraman et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Emotional distress is an important dimension in diabetes, and several instruments have been developed to measure this aspect. The Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale is one such instrument which has demonstrated validity and reliability in Western populations, but its psychometric properties in Asian populations have not been examined.

Methods: This was a secondary analysis of data from patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus recruited through convenience sampling from a diabetes specialist outpatient clinic in Singapore. The following psychometric properties were assessed: Construct validity through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch analysis, concurrent validity through correlation with related scales (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, Diabetes Health Profile-psychological distress, Audit of Diabetes Dependent Quality of Life), reliability through assessment of internal consistency and floor and ceiling effects, and sensitivity by estimating effect sizes for known clinical and social functioning groups.

Results: 203 patients with mean age of 45±12 years were analysed. None of the previously published model structures achieved a good fit on CFA. On Rasch analysis, four items showed poor fit and were removed. The abridged 16-item PAID mapped to a single latent trait, with a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach ɑ 0.95), but significant floor effect (24.6% scoring at floor). Both 20-item and 16-item PAID scores were moderately correlated with scores of related scales, and sensitive to differences in clinical and social functioning groups, with large effect sizes for glycemic control and diabetes related complications, nephropathy and neuropathy.

Conclusion: The abridged 16-item PAID measures a single latent trait of emotional distress due to diabetes whereas the 20-item PAID appears to measures more than one latent trait. However, both the 16-item and 20-item PAID versions are valid, reliable and sensitive for use among Singaporean patients with diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Item-person map illustrating the distribution of item difficulty along the y-axis and person ability along the x-axis.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Polonsky WH, Anderson BJ, Lohrer PA, Welch G, Jacobson AM, Aponte JE, et al. Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes care. 1995;18(6):754–60. . - PubMed
    1. Welch GW, Jacobson AM, Polonsky WH. The Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale. An evaluation of its clinical utility. Diabetes care. 1997;20(5):760–6. . - PubMed
    1. Snoek FJ, Pouwer F, Welch GW, Polonsky WH. Diabetes-related emotional distress in Dutch and U.S. diabetic patients: cross-cultural validity of the problem areas in diabetes scale. Diabetes care. 2000;23(9):1305–9. . - PubMed
    1. Welch G, Weinger K, Anderson B, Polonsky WH. Responsiveness of the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) questionnaire. Diabetic medicine: a journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2003;20(1):69–72. . - PubMed
    1. Graue M, Haugstvedt A, Wentzel-Larsen T, Iversen MM, Karlsen B, Rokne B. Diabetes-related emotional distress in adults: reliability and validity of the Norwegian versions of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID) and the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS). International journal of nursing studies. 2012;49(2):174–82. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.08.007 . - DOI - PubMed

Publication types