Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep 7;282(1814):20151130.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1130.

Constructing more informative plant-pollinator networks: visitation and pollen deposition networks in a heathland plant community

Affiliations

Constructing more informative plant-pollinator networks: visitation and pollen deposition networks in a heathland plant community

G Ballantyne et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Interaction networks are widely used as tools to understand plant-pollinator communities, and to examine potential threats to plant diversity and food security if the ecosystem service provided by pollinating animals declines. However, most networks to date are based on recording visits to flowers, rather than recording clearly defined effective pollination events. Here we provide the first networks that explicitly incorporate measures of pollinator effectiveness (PE) from pollen deposition on stigmas per visit, and pollinator importance (PI) as the product of PE and visit frequency. These more informative networks, here produced for a low diversity heathland habitat, reveal that plant-pollinator interactions are more specialized than shown in most previous studies. At the studied site, the specialization index [Formula: see text] was lower for the visitation network than the PE network, which was in turn lower than [Formula: see text] for the PI network. Our study shows that collecting PE data is feasible for community-level studies in low diversity communities and that including information about PE can change the structure of interaction networks. This could have important consequences for our understanding of threats to pollination systems.

Keywords: network; pollination; pollinator effectiveness; pollinator importance; specialization; species interaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Single visit deposition (PE) of conspecific pollen: (a) pollen and nectar-foragers; (b) legitimate and robbing flower visitors. Median, interquartile range and outliers for individual visits are shown for each plant species. Significant differences marked with triangle.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Bipartite networks illustrating (a) flower visitation, from stationary observations; (b) pollinator effectiveness of visitors (mean SVD); (c) pollinator importance of visitors, combining the data from (a) and (b). Key code, visitor group: 1, Bombus terrestris/lucorum; 2, Bombus pascuorum; 3, Bombus lapidarius; 4, Bombus jonellus; 5, Bombus hortorum; 6, Apis mellifera; 7, Halictidae; 8, other solitary bees; 9, large hoverflies; 10, Episyrphus; 11, Eupeodes; 12, small hoverflies; 13, Muscidae; 14, ants (Lasius); 15, Lepidoptera; 16, soldier fly.

References

    1. Waser NM, Ollerton J (eds). 2006. Plant–pollinator interactions: from specialization to generalization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    1. Willmer PG. 2011. Pollination and floral ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    1. Garratt MPD, Coston DJ, Truslove CL, Lappage MG, Polce C, Dean R, Biesmeijer JC, Potts SG. 2014. The identity of crop pollinators helps target conservation for improved ecosystem services. Biol. Conserv. 169, 128–135. (10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.001) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baldock KCR, Memmott J, Ruiz-Guajardo JC, Roze D, Stone GN. 2011. Daily temporal structure in African savanna flower visitation networks and consequences for network sampling. Ecology 92, 687–698. (10.1890/10-1110.1) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winfree R, Williams NM, Dushoff J, Kremen C. 2014. Species abundance, not diet breadth, drives the persistence of the most linked pollinators as plant–pollinator networks disassemble. Am. Nat. 183, 600–611. (10.1086/675716) - DOI - PubMed

Publication types