A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of Daily Vibration After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
- PMID: 26337247
- DOI: 10.1177/0363546515599630
A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of Daily Vibration After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
Abstract
Background: Rotator cuff repair is a common method to treat rotator cuff tears; however, retear rates remain high. High-frequency, low-magnitude vibration has been demonstrated to promote new bone formation in both animal models and in humans.
Hypothesis: This type of mechanical stimulation applied postoperatively will enhance tendon-to-bone healing and reduce postoperative retear rates.
Study design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
Methods: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted to investigate the effects of 5 minutes of 80-Hz vibration applied daily after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for 6 months on postoperative rotator cuff healing. The primary outcome was ultrasound-assessed repair integrity at 6 months after repair. Recruited patients were randomized into 2 groups: one group received a vibration device that oscillated at 80 Hz, and the other group received a placebo device.
Results: The postoperative retear rates of both groups were similar (9.1% [5/55] in the vibration group, and 9.3% [5/54] in the placebo group) at 6 months as determined by ultrasound imaging. Vibration did provide acute pain relief at 6 weeks after surgery (visual analog scale [VAS] score, 2.24 ± 0.29 cm) compared with placebo (VAS score, 3.67 ± 0.48 cm) (P < .003). Six months after surgery, both groups had significant reductions in pain during overhead activities, at rest, and during sleep and overall shoulder pain compared with before surgery (P < .001). Both the vibration and placebo groups had significant increases in shoulder strength with abduction in the scapular plane, adduction, liftoff, internal rotation, and external rotation 6 months after surgery. Statistical analysis showed that vibration was not a contributing factor at improving these parameters in these periods.
Conclusion: High-frequency, low-magnitude vibration did provide acute pain relief on application 6 weeks after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. However, vibration did not improve tendon-to-bone healing, shoulder range of motion, shoulder strength, or shoulder pain with activities, at rest, and at night when compared with placebo.
Keywords: arthroscopic rotator cuff repair; rotator cuff; shoulder; tendon-to-bone healing; vibration.
© 2015 The Author(s).
Similar articles
-
Revision versus primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a 2-year analysis of outcomes in 360 patients.Am J Sports Med. 2015 Mar;43(3):557-64. doi: 10.1177/0363546514560729. Epub 2014 Dec 19. Am J Sports Med. 2015. PMID: 25527081
-
Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears Showed Lower Short-term Retear Rates After Arthroscopic Double-Layer Repair Versus Bursal Layer-Only Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Am J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):689-696. doi: 10.1177/0363546519897033. Epub 2020 Jan 9. Am J Sports Med. 2020. PMID: 31917608 Clinical Trial.
-
Is It Safe to Inject Corticosteroids Into the Glenohumeral Joint After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair?Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jun;47(7):1694-1700. doi: 10.1177/0363546519843910. Epub 2019 May 14. Am J Sports Med. 2019. PMID: 31084488 Clinical Trial.
-
Early Versus Delayed Passive Range of Motion Exercise for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Am J Sports Med. 2015 May;43(5):1265-73. doi: 10.1177/0363546514544698. Epub 2014 Aug 20. Am J Sports Med. 2015. PMID: 25143489
-
Early versus delayed mobilization for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (small to large sized tear): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Dec 4;24(1):938. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-07075-5. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023. PMID: 38049792 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
A Historical Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Rotator Cuff Tears.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 20;17(18):6863. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186863. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32962199 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The effect of age on risk of retear after rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JSES Int. 2020 Jun 10;4(3):625-631. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.03.014. eCollection 2020 Sep. JSES Int. 2020. PMID: 32939497 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Vibration Therapy - A Clinical Commentary.Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Aug 1;17(6):984-987. doi: 10.26603/001c.36964. eCollection 2022. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2022. PMID: 36237646 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Are we getting any better? A study on repair integrity in 1600 consecutive arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs.JSES Open Access. 2019 Mar 11;3(1):12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jses.2019.01.002. eCollection 2019 Mar. JSES Open Access. 2019. PMID: 30976730 Free PMC article.
-
Placebo response in neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis of individual participant data.J Pain Res. 2018 Apr 30;11:901-912. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S155979. eCollection 2018. J Pain Res. 2018. PMID: 29750052 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources