Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan:53:260-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Aug 19.

Postoperative patients' perspectives on rating pain: A qualitative study

Affiliations

Postoperative patients' perspectives on rating pain: A qualitative study

Jacqueline F M van Dijk et al. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

Background: In postoperative pain treatment patients are asked to rate their pain experience on a single uni-dimensional pain scale. Such pain scores are also used as indicator to assess the quality of pain treatment. However, patients may differ in how they interpret the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score.

Objectives: This study examines how patients assign a number to their currently experienced postoperative pain and which considerations influence this process.

Methods: A qualitative approach according to grounded theory was used. Twenty-seven patients were interviewed one day after surgery.

Results: Three main themes emerged that influenced the Numeric Rating Scale scores (0-10) that patients actually reported to professionals: score-related factors, intrapersonal factors, and the anticipated consequences of a given pain score. Anticipated consequences were analgesic administration-which could be desired or undesired-and possible judgements by professionals. We also propose a conceptual model for the relationship between factors that influence the pain rating process. Based on patients' score-related and intrapersonal factors, a preliminary pain score was "internally" set. Before reporting the pain score to the healthcare professional, patients considered the anticipated consequences (i.e., expected judgements by professionals and anticipation of analgesic administration) of current Numeric Rating Scale scores.

Conclusions: This study provides insight into the process of how patients translate their current postoperative pain into a numeric rating score. The proposed model may help professionals to understand the factors that influence a given Numeric Rating Scale score and suggest the most appropriate questions for clarification. In this way, patients and professionals may arrive at a shared understanding of the pain score, resulting in a tailored decision regarding the most appropriate treatment of current postoperative pain, particularly the dosing and timing of opioid administration.

Keywords: Interviews; Pain assessment; Pain treatment; Postoperative pain; Qualitative study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources