Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Sep;21 Suppl(sup1):62-8.
doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1043727.

Patient safety initiatives in Central and Eastern Europe: A mixed methods approach by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care

Affiliations
Review

Patient safety initiatives in Central and Eastern Europe: A mixed methods approach by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care

Maciek Godycki-Cwirko et al. Eur J Gen Pract. 2015 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Despite patient safety being recognized as an important healthcare issue in the European Union, there has been variable implementation of patient safety initiatives in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE).

Objective: To assess the status of patient safety initiatives in countries in CEE; to describe a process of engagement in Poland, which can serve as a template for the implementation of patient safety initiatives in primary care.

Methods: A mixed methods design was used. We conducted a review of literature focusing on publications from CEE, an inventory of patient safety initiatives in CEE countries, interviews with key informants, international survey, review of national reporting systems, and pilot demonstrator project in Poland with implementation of patient safety toolkits assessment.

Results: There was no published patient safety research from Albania, Belarus, Greece, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, or Russia. Nine papers were found from Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Poland, Serbia, and Slovenia. In most of the CEE countries, patient safety had been addressed at the policy level although the focus was mainly in hospital care. There was a dearth of activity in primary care. The use of patient improvement strategies was low.

Conclusion: International cooperation as exemplified in the demonstrator project can help in the development and implementation of patient safety initiatives in primary care in changing the emphasis away from a blame culture to one where greater emphasis is placed on improvement and learning.

Keywords: LINNEAUS collaboration; Patient safety; implementation; primary care; safety culture.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. World Health Organization (WHO) Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2007. Report on the web-based modified Delphi survey of the international classification for patient safety.
    1. Esmail A, Valderas JM, Verstappen W, Godycki-Cwirko M, Wensing M. Developing a research agenda for patient safety in primary care. Background, aims and output of the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care. Eur J Gen Pract. 2015;21((S1)):3–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ely JW, Levinson W, Elder NC, Mainous AG, 3rd, Vinson DC. Perceived causes of family physicians’ errors. J Fam Pract. 1995;40:337–44. - PubMed
    1. Shulman JI, Shulman S, Haines AP. The prevention of adverse drug reactions—a potential role for pharmacists in the primary care team? J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981;31:429–34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Standing Committee of the Hospitals of the European Union . Leuven, Belgium: Working Party on Quality Care in Hospitals (HOPE); 1996. The quality of hospital care in the European Union.

Publication types