Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan 1;44(1):8-13.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.07.034. Epub 2015 Sep 2.

Compliance with standard precautions: Results of a French national audit

Marine Giard  1 , Elisabeth Laprugne-Garcia  2 , Emmanuelle Caillat-Vallet  2 , Ian Russell  2 , Delphine Verjat-Trannoy  3 , Marie-Alix Ertzscheid  4 , Nathalie Vernier  5 , Catherine Laland  6 , Anne Savey  7 ; French Group for Infection Control Practice Assessment
Affiliations

Compliance with standard precautions: Results of a French national audit

Marine Giard et al. Am J Infect Control. .

Abstract

Background: Standard precautions (SPs) aim to reduce the risk of cross-transmission of microorganisms. The objectives of the present study were to assess institutional policies for SPs promotion, available resources for SPs implementation, and education of health care workers (HCWs) and their compliance with SPs.

Methods: A multisite mixed-methods audit was conducted in 2011. Self-assessment questionnaires were administered at institution, ward, and HCW levels in French health care facilities (HCFs). Results were given as percentage of objectives achieved (POA) or percentage of "never or sometimes," "often," and "always" responses for each question.

Results: A total of 1599 HCFs participated, including 14,968 wards and 203,840 HCWs. At an institutional level, the POA was 88%, covering SPs promotion (91%), procedures (99%), and SPs evaluation (63%). At the ward level, the POA was 94%, covering procedures (95%) and resources (93%). HCWs reported the best compliance for changing gloves between patients (94.5% "always"), and the worst compliance for the use of gloves for intramuscular injection and the use of eye protection in cases of blood exposure risk (34.5% and 24.4% of "always," respectively).

Conclusions: A literature review found no other study of SPs that included such a large study group. These results led to SPs promotion actions at local and regional levels. Reinforcement of SPs observance will be prioritized in the next national program from the French Ministry of Health.

Keywords: Assessment; France; Hand hygiene; Health care workers; National audit; Standard precautions.

PubMed Disclaimer