Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar;97(3):490-492.e1.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.422. Epub 2015 Sep 3.

Sensitivity and Specificity of the Coma Recovery Scale--Revised Total Score in Detection of Conscious Awareness

Affiliations

Sensitivity and Specificity of the Coma Recovery Scale--Revised Total Score in Detection of Conscious Awareness

Yelena G Bodien et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To describe the sensitivity and specificity of Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) total scores in detecting conscious awareness.

Design: Data were retrospectively extracted from the medical records of patients enrolled in a specialized disorders of consciousness (DOC) program. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were completed using CRS-R-derived diagnoses of minimally conscious state (MCS) or emerged from minimally conscious state (EMCS) as the reference standard for conscious awareness and the total CRS-R score as the test criterion. A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to demonstrate the optimal CRS-R total cutoff score for maximizing sensitivity and specificity.

Setting: Specialized DOC program.

Participants: Patients enrolled in the DOC program (N=252, 157 men; mean age, 49y; mean time from injury, 48d; traumatic etiology, n=127; nontraumatic etiology, n=125; diagnosis of coma or vegetative state, n=70; diagnosis of MCS or EMCS, n=182).

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Sensitivity and specificity of CRS-R total scores in detecting conscious awareness.

Results: A CRS-R total score of 10 or higher yielded a sensitivity of .78 for correct identification of patients in MCS or EMCS, and a specificity of 1.00 for correct identification of patients who did not meet criteria for either of these diagnoses (ie, were diagnosed with vegetative state or coma). The area under the curve in the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis is .98.

Conclusions: A total CRS-R score of 10 or higher provides strong evidence of conscious awareness but resulted in a false-negative diagnostic error in 22% of patients who demonstrated conscious awareness based on CRS-R diagnostic criteria. A cutoff score of 8 provides the best balance between sensitivity and specificity, accurately classifying 93% of cases. The optimal total score cutoff will vary depending on the user's objective.

Keywords: Brain injuries; Consciousness disorders; Rehabilitation; Sensitivity and specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver Operating Curve indicating sensitivity and specificity of CRS-R total scores highlighting the optimal cut-off score of 8. This score yields a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 96%. The area under the curve is 0.98, indicating that the CRS-R total score accurately differentiates patients who meet diagnostic criteria for conscious awareness from those who do not.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Medical Aspects of the Persistent Vegetative State. New England Journal of Medicine. 1994;330(21):1499–1508. - PubMed
    1. Giacino JT, et al. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002;58(3):349–53. - PubMed
    1. Lammi MH, et al. The minimally conscious state and recovery potential: a follow-up study 2 to 5 years after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(4):746–54. - PubMed
    1. Schnakers C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurol. 2009;9:35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(12):2020–9. - PubMed

Publication types