Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug 26;7(3):233-54.
doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics7030233.

Development of Biodegradable Polycation-Based Inhalable Dry Gene Powders by Spray Freeze Drying

Affiliations

Development of Biodegradable Polycation-Based Inhalable Dry Gene Powders by Spray Freeze Drying

Tomoyuki Okuda et al. Pharmaceutics. .

Abstract

In this study, two types of biodegradable polycation (PAsp(DET) homopolymer and PEG-PAsp(DET) copolymer) were applied as vectors for inhalable dry gene powders prepared by spray freeze drying (SFD). The prepared dry gene powders had spherical and porous structures with a 5~10-μm diameter, and the integrity of plasmid DNA could be maintained during powder production. Furthermore, it was clarified that PEG-PAsp(DET)-based dry gene powder could more sufficiently maintain both the physicochemical properties and in vitro gene transfection efficiencies of polyplexes reconstituted after powder production than PAsp(DET)-based dry gene powder. From an in vitro inhalation study using an Andersen cascade impactor, it was demonstrated that the addition of l-leucine could markedly improve the inhalation performance of dry powders prepared by SFD. Following pulmonary delivery to mice, both PAsp(DET)- and PEG-PAsp(DET)-based dry gene powders could achieve higher gene transfection efficiencies in the lungs compared with a chitosan-based dry gene powder previously reported by us.

Keywords: biodegradable polycations; dry powder inhalers (DPIs); porous particles; pulmonary gene transfection; spray freeze drying (SFD).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Chemical structures of (A) PAsp(DET) and (B) PEG-PAsp(DET).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Diagram of the SFD setup.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scanning electron micrographs of (A) Man DP, (B) Man-Leu DP, (C) PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 4), and (D) PEG-PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 40).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Integrity of pDNA in PAsp(DET) DP and PEG-PAsp(DET) DP after powder production by SFD. (A,H) naked pDNA, (B,G) pDNA digested with Hind III, (C,D) PAsp(DET) polyplex before and after powder production of PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 4), (E,F) PAsp(DET) polyplex before and after powder production of PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 8), (I,J) PEG-PAsp(DET) polyplex before and after powder production of PEG-PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 40), and (K,L) PEG-PAsp(DET) polyplex before and after powder production of PEG-PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 80). Electrophoresis of the samples for PAsp(DET) DP and PEG-PAsp(DET) DP was separately carried out with the individual gels. In the fluorescent image of each gel, the regions related to this study (shown as solid and dotted lines) were selectively cut off to combine with no modification. The position of each band in the combined images is the same as that in the original ones.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) Particle size and (B) zeta potential of polyplexes formed before and after powder production by SFD. Each powder was dissolved in ultra-pure water to reconstitute the polyplex. Each value represents the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). Significant difference compared with before power production (**, P < 0.01).
Figure 6
Figure 6
In vitro gene transfection efficiencies against CT26 cells by polyplexes formed before and after powder production by SFD. Each powder was dissolved in ultra-pure water to reconstitute the polyplex. Each value represents the mean ± S.D. (n = 4). Significant difference compared with before powder production (**, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05).
Figure 7
Figure 7
In vitro deposition patterns of Man DP, Man-Leu DP, PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 4), and PEG-PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 40) in an 8-stage Andersen cascade impactor following inspiration at a flow rate of 28.3 L/min and for a flow time of 5 s. Each value represents the mean ± S.D. (n = 3).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Optical images of pulmonary delivery and gene expression by (A) PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 4), (B) PEG-PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 40), (C) PAsp(DET) SL (N/P = 4), (D) PEG-PAsp(DET) SL (N/P = 40), and (E) Chitosan DP (N/P = 10). The pulmonary delivery and gene expression were evaluated by the detection of fluorescence derived from ICG (Fl) and luminescence corresponding to luciferase activity (Lu) using IVIS® following pulmonary administration to mice, respectively. The color scales are in photons/s/cm2/sr.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Correlation between pulmonary delivery and gene expression by PAsp(DET) DP and SL (N/P = 4), PEG-PAsp(DET) DP and SL (N/P = 40), and Chitosan DP. In the correlation diagram, fluorescence intensity derived from ICG at 15 min and maximum luminescence intensity corresponding to luciferase activity, which were calculated by IVIS®, following pulmonary administration into mice were plotted, respectively. The calculated intensities were corrected using each pre-administered mouse.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Histological observation of lungs excised at 48 h following the pulmonary delivery of (C) PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 4) and (D) PEG-PAsp(DET) DP (N/P = 40) into mice. (A) Water and (B) Man-Leu DP were administered as negative controls, and (E) lipopolysaccharide (120 mg/kg) was a positive control.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Edelstein M.L., Abedi M.R., Wixon J. Gene therapy clinical trials worldwide to 2007—An update. J. Gene Med. 2007;9:833–842. doi: 10.1002/jgm.1100. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kawakami S., Higuchi Y., Hashida M. Nonviral approaches for targeted delivery of plasmid DNA and oligonucleotide. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008;97:726–745. doi: 10.1002/jps.21024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gill D.R., Davies L.A., Pringle I.A., Hyde S.C. The development of gene therapy for diseases of the lung. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2004;61:355–368. doi: 10.1007/s00018-003-3317-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Geiger J, Aneja M.K., Rudolph C. Vectors for pulmonary gene therapy. Int. J. Pharm. 2010;390:84–88. - PubMed
    1. Zhou Q.T., Tang P., Leung S.S., Chan J.G., Chan H.K. Emerging inhalation aerosol devices and strategies: Where are we headed? Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2014;75:3–17. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.03.006. - DOI - PubMed