Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jul 2;2(3):515-36.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines2030515.

Peptide Vaccine: Progress and Challenges

Affiliations
Review

Peptide Vaccine: Progress and Challenges

Weidang Li et al. Vaccines (Basel). .

Abstract

Conventional vaccine strategies have been highly efficacious for several decades in reducing mortality and morbidity due to infectious diseases. The bane of conventional vaccines, such as those that include whole organisms or large proteins, appear to be the inclusion of unnecessary antigenic load that, not only contributes little to the protective immune response, but complicates the situation by inducing allergenic and/or reactogenic responses. Peptide vaccines are an attractive alternative strategy that relies on usage of short peptide fragments to engineer the induction of highly targeted immune responses, consequently avoiding allergenic and/or reactogenic sequences. Conversely, peptide vaccines used in isolation are often weakly immunogenic and require particulate carriers for delivery and adjuvanting. In this article, we discuss the specific advantages and considerations in targeted induction of immune responses by peptide vaccines and progresses in the development of such vaccines against various diseases. Additionally, we also discuss the development of particulate carrier strategies and the inherent challenges with regard to safety when combining such technologies with peptide vaccines.

Keywords: adjuvants; epitope; peptide vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Central role of CD4+ T cells in peptide vaccines. Vaccine-induced immune response to control microbial pathogens may involve cytotoxic CD8+ T cell responses, helper CD4+ T cell responses, or antibody (B cell) responses. T cells recognize linear epitopes presented by antigen presenting cells, whereas B cells are capable of recognizing linear and conformational epitopes on soluble antigens. The induction of robust CD8+ T cell and/or antibody responses requires cytokine help from CD4+ T cells. Therefore, regardless of the nature of protective immune response required, the induction of CD4+ T cell responses is critical.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bachler B.C., Humbert M., Palikuqi B., Siddappa N.B., Lakhashe S.K., Rasmussen R.A., Ruprecht R.M. Novel biopanning strategy to identify epitopes associated with vaccine protection. J. Virol. 2013;87:4403–4416. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02888-12. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perrie Y., Kirby D., Bramwell V.W., Mohammed A.R. Recent developments in particulate-based vaccines. Recent Pat. Drug Deliv. Formul. 2007;1:117–129. doi: 10.2174/187221107780831897. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Black M., Trent A., Tirrell M., Olive C. Advances in the design and delivery of peptide subunit vaccines with a focus on toll-like receptor agonists. Expert Rev. Vaccines. 2010;9:157–173. doi: 10.1586/erv.09.160. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thompson A.L., Staats H.F. Cytokines: The future of intranasal vaccine adjuvants. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2011;2011 doi: 10.1155/2011/289597. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petrovsky N., Aguilar J.C. Vaccine adjuvants: Current state and future trends. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2004;82:488–496. doi: 10.1111/j.0818-9641.2004.01272.x. - DOI - PubMed