Interventions in the management of infection in the foot in diabetes: a systematic review
- PMID: 26344844
- DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.2706
Interventions in the management of infection in the foot in diabetes: a systematic review
Abstract
The expert panel on diabetic foot infection (DFI) of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot conducted a systematic review seeking all published reports relating to any type of treatment for infection of the foot in persons with diabetes published as of 30 June 2014. This review, conducted with both PubMed and EMBASE, was used to update an earlier one undertaken on 30 June 2010 using the same search string. Eligible publications included those that had outcome measures reported for both a treated and a control population that were managed either at the same time, or as part of a before-and-after case design. We did not include studies that contained only information related to definition or diagnosis, but not treatment, of DFI. The current search identified just seven new articles meeting our criteria that were published since the 33 identified with the previous search, making a total of 40 articles from the world literature. The identified articles included 37 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and three cohort studies with concurrent controls, and included studies on the use of surgical procedures, topical antiseptics, negative pressure wound therapy and hyperbaric oxygen. Among the studies were 15 RCTs that compared outcomes of treatment with new antibiotic preparations compared with a conventional therapy in the management of skin and soft tissue infection. In addition, 10 RCTs and 1 cohort study compared different treatments for osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. Results of comparisons of different antibiotic regimens generally demonstrated that newly introduced antibiotic regimens appeared to be as effective as conventional therapy (and also more cost-effective in one study), but one study failed to demonstrate non-inferiority of a new antibiotic compared with that of a standard agent. Overall, the available literature was both limited in both the number of studies and the quality of their design. Thus, our systematic review revealed little evidence upon which to make recommendations for treatment of DFIs. There is a great need for further well-designed trials that will provide robust data upon which to make decisions about the most appropriate treatment of both skin and soft tissue infection and osteomyelitis in diabetic patients.
Keywords: antibiotics; diabetes mellitus; diabetic foot infection; osteomyelitis; surgery; systematic review.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of interventions to enhance healing of chronic ulcers of the foot in diabetes: a systematic review.Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016 Jan;32 Suppl 1:154-68. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2707. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016. PMID: 26344936
-
Topical antimicrobial agents for treating foot ulcers in people with diabetes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 14;6(6):CD011038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011038.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28613416 Free PMC article.
-
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5:CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5. PMID: 33871055 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701100
-
Antiseptics for burns.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 12;7(7):CD011821. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011821.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28700086 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Osteomyelitis of the lower extremity: pathophysiology, imaging, and classification, with an emphasis on diabetic foot infection.Emerg Radiol. 2018 Apr;25(2):175-188. doi: 10.1007/s10140-017-1564-9. Epub 2017 Oct 20. Emerg Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29058098 Review.
-
Modified poly(L-lysine)-based structures as novel antimicrobials for diabetic foot infections, an in-vitro study.HRB Open Res. 2022 Jan 12;5:4. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13380.1. eCollection 2022. HRB Open Res. 2022. PMID: 36017374 Free PMC article.
-
The effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy as a novel management of diabetic foot ulcers: an overview of systematic reviews.J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2019 Nov 25;18(2):625-641. doi: 10.1007/s40200-019-00447-6. eCollection 2019 Dec. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2019. PMID: 31890688 Free PMC article. Review.
-
ESKAPE Pathogens in Bloodstream Infections Are Associated With Higher Cost and Mortality but Can Be Predicted Using Diagnoses Upon Admission.Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Nov 22;6(12):ofz503. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz503. eCollection 2019 Dec. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019. PMID: 31844639 Free PMC article.
-
Plantar pressure thresholds as a strategy to prevent diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review.Heliyon. 2024 Feb 14;10(4):e26161. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26161. eCollection 2024 Feb 29. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38390156 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical