CLINICAL RELIABILITY AND DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF VISUAL SCAPULOHUMERAL MOVEMENT EVALUATION IN DETECTING PATIENTS WITH SHOULDER IMPAIRMENT
- PMID: 26346446
- PMCID: PMC4527193
CLINICAL RELIABILITY AND DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF VISUAL SCAPULOHUMERAL MOVEMENT EVALUATION IN DETECTING PATIENTS WITH SHOULDER IMPAIRMENT
Abstract
Background: Clinical investigation of shoulder injuries commonly utilizes visual evaluation of scapular movement to determine if abnormal or asymmetrical movements are related to the injury. To date, the intrarater reliability and diagnostic accuracy of visual evaluation of scapular movement among physical therapists are not known.
Purpose: The aims of this study were to determine the clinical reliability and diagnostic accuracy of physical therapists visual evaluation of scapulohumeral movements when used to diagnose shoulder impairment.
Study design: University based laboratory and an internet based survey.
Methods: Thirty-three physical therapists and 12 patient participants participated in this study. Reliability was measured as percent agreement and using the free marginal kappa statistic (κ) and Cronbach's alpha (α) for interrater and intrarater reliability respectively. Diagnostic accuracy variables such as sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios were calculated from contingency table analysis.
Results: Visual evaluation yielded the following (95% CI): diagnostic accuracy 49.5%, specificity 60% (56 - 64), and sensitivity 35% (29 - 41), positive and negative likelihood ratios were 0.87 (0.66 - 1.14) and 1.09 (0.92 - 1.27) respectively. Percent agreements of evaluation findings between sessions for static and dynamic symmetry were 69% and 68%, respectively. The alpha statistics for static and dynamic symmetry were both 0.51. Percentage agreement in determining the injured shoulder was 59%, with an alpha statistic of 0.35.
Conclusion: Visual evaluation of scapular movements, without additional clinical information, demonstrated a poor to fair reliability and poor to fair diagnostic accuracy.
Clinical relevance: The clinical utility of the use of isolated visual scapular evaluation is cautioned. More reliable and valid objective measures are needed for diagnosing shoulder impairment.
Level of evidence: 2b, Exploratory cohort study.
Keywords: Diagnostic accuracy; reliability; scapulohumeral rhythm; shoulder examination.
Similar articles
-
Intertester reliability of a movement impairment-based classification system for individuals with shoulder pain.Hong Kong Physiother J. 2020 Jun;40(1):51-62. doi: 10.1142/S1013702520500067. Epub 2020 Jan 28. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2020. PMID: 32489240 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability, agreement, and diagnostic accuracy of the Modified Lateral Scapular Slide test.Man Ther. 2016 Aug;24:18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Apr 19. Man Ther. 2016. PMID: 27317502
-
Utility of lateral scapular radiographs in initial evaluation of nontraumatic shoulder conditions.JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2022 Feb 11;2(2):149-154. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.01.001. eCollection 2022 May. JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2022. PMID: 37587963 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical assessment of the scapula: a review of the literature.Br J Sports Med. 2014 Jun;48(11):883-90. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091059. Epub 2012 Jul 21. Br J Sports Med. 2014. PMID: 22821720 Review.
-
Scapular dyskinesis and its relation to shoulder injury.J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012 Jun;20(6):364-72. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-20-06-364. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012. PMID: 22661566 Review.
Cited by
-
A Comparison of Resting Scapular Posture and the Davies Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test.Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Jun 1;16(3):835-843. doi: 10.26603/001c.23425. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021. PMID: 34123535 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability of the Scapula Reposition Test in Subjects with Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy and Scapular Dyskinesis.J Clin Med. 2019 Dec 28;9(1):80. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010080. J Clin Med. 2019. PMID: 31905620 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability of assessment methods for scapular dyskinesis in asymptomatic subjects: A systematic review.Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2020 Sep;54(5):546-556. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19088. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2020. PMID: 33155568 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Magee DJ. Orthopedic Physical Assessment. Vol 5: Saunders, Elsevier; 2008.
-
- Dutton M. Orthopaedic Examination, Evaluation, and Intervention. New York: McGraw Hill; 2004.
-
- Struyf F Nijs J Mottram S Roussel NA Cools AMJ Meeusen R. Clinical assessment of the scapula: a review of the literature. Br J Sports Med. 2012;48(11):883‐890. - PubMed
-
- Kibler W Ludewig P McClure P Uhl T Sciascia A. Scapular Summit 2009: introduction. July 16, 2009, Lexington, Kentucky. Journal Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(11):A1. - PubMed
-
- Hickey BW Milosavljevic S Bell ML Milburn PD. Accuracy and reliability of observational motion analysis in identifying shoulder symptoms. Man Ther. 2007;12(3):263‐270. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials