Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Apr;117(5):781-94.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcv134. Epub 2015 Sep 7.

Species diversity vs. morphological disparity in the light of evolutionary developmental biology

Affiliations
Review

Species diversity vs. morphological disparity in the light of evolutionary developmental biology

Alessandro Minelli. Ann Bot. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Two indicators of a clade's success are its diversity (number of included species) and its disparity (extent of morphospace occupied by its members). Many large genera show high diversity with low disparity, while others such as Euphorbia and Drosophila are highly diverse but also exhibit high disparity. The largest genera are often characterized by key innovations that often, but not necessarily, coincide with their diagnostic apomorphies. In terms of their contribution to speciation, apomorphies are either permissive (e.g. flightlessness) or generative (e.g. nectariferous spurs).

Scope: Except for Drosophila, virtually no genus among those with the highest diversity or disparity includes species currently studied as model species in developmental genetics or evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo). An evo-devo approach is, however, potentially important to understand how diversity and disparity could rapidly increase in the largest genera currently accepted by taxonomists. The most promising directions for future research and a set of key questions to be addressed are presented in this review.

Conclusions: From an evo-devo perspective, the evolution of clades with high diversity and/or disparity can be addressed from three main perspectives: (1) evolvability, in terms of release from previous constraints and of the presence of genetic or developmental conditions favouring multiple parallel occurrences of a given evolutionary transition and its reversal; (2) phenotypic plasticity as a facilitator of speciation; and (3) modularity, heterochrony and a coupling between the complexity of the life cycle and the evolution of diversity and disparity in a clade. This simple preliminary analysis suggests a set of topics that deserve priority for scrutiny, including the possible role of saltational evolution in the origination of high diversity and/or disparity, the predictability of morphological evolution following release from a former constraint, and the extent and the possible causes of a positive correlation between diversity and disparity and the complexity of the life cycle.

Keywords: Phenotypic plasticity; evolvability; generative key innovation; heteroblasty; heterochrony; large genera; life cycle complexity; modularity; permissive key innovation; species diversity; species robustness..

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albach DC, Martinez-Ortega MM, Chase MW. 2004. Veronica: parallel morphological evolution and phylogeography in the Mediterranean. Plant Systematics and Evolution 246: 177–194.
    1. Alberch P. 1991. From genes to phenotype: dynamical systems and evolvability. Genetica 84: 5–11. - PubMed
    1. Alberch P, Gould SJ, Oster G, Wake D. 1979. Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology 5: 296–317.
    1. AlgaeBase. www.algaebase.org (last accessed 28 March 2015).
    1. Alsopp A. 1966. Heteroblastic development in vascular plants. In: Abercrombie M, Brachet M, eds. Advances in morphogenesis, Vol. 6 New York: Academic Press, 127–171. - PubMed