The quality of systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments
- PMID: 26346986
- PMCID: PMC4830864
- DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-1122-4
The quality of systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments
Abstract
Background: Systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments are important tools for the selection of instruments for research and clinical practice. Our aim was to assess the quality of systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments and to determine whether the quality has improved since our previous study in 2007.
Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE and EMBASE between July 1, 2013, and June 19, 2014. The quality of the reviews was rated using a study-specific checklist.
Results: A total of 102 reviews were included. In many reviews the search strategy was considered not comprehensive; in only 59 % of the reviews a search was performed in EMBASE and in about half of the reviews there was doubt about the comprehensiveness of the search terms used for type of measurement instruments and measurement properties. In 41 % of the reviews, compared to 30 % in our previous study, the methodological quality of the included studies was assessed. In 58 %, compared to 55 %, the quality of the included instruments was assessed. In 42 %, compared to 7 %, a data synthesis was performed in which the results from multiple studies on the same instrument were somehow combined.
Conclusion: Despite a clear improvement in the quality of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments in comparison with our previous study in 2007, there is still room for improvement with regard to the search strategy, and especially the quality assessment of the included studies and the included instruments, and the data synthesis.
Keywords: Measurement properties; Outcome measurement instruments; Reliability; Systematic review; Validity.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27532315
-
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29372930 Free PMC article.
-
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27532314
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701100
-
Treatments for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP): an overview of systematic reviews.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 13;1(1):CD010369. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010369.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28084646 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Jul 9;22(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02256-9. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024. PMID: 38978063 Free PMC article.
-
Development of an Item Bank to Measure Medication Adherence: Systematic Review.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 8;22(10):e19089. doi: 10.2196/19089. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 33030441 Free PMC article.
-
Tools Measuring Quality of Death, Dying, and Care, Completed after Death: Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties.Patient. 2019 Apr;12(2):183-197. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0328-2. Patient. 2019. PMID: 30141020 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring women's childbirth experiences: a systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jun 29;17(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1356-y. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017. PMID: 28662645 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring general mental health in early-mid adolescence: A systematic meta-review of content and psychometrics.JCPP Adv. 2022 Dec 23;3(1):e12125. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12125. eCollection 2023 Mar. JCPP Adv. 2022. PMID: 37431313 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research. 2010;19:539–549. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources