Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Nov 1;116(9):1451-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.07.074. Epub 2015 Aug 14.

Meta-Analysis of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Meta-Analysis of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Ahmed Elkalioubie et al. Am J Cardiol. .

Abstract

The high coronary artery disease (CAD) prevalence in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is well known. However, the inverse relation has been little explored. We present, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published evidence, a critical appraisal of the issue of AAA prevalence and also AAA predictive risk factors in patients with CAD, comparing it with AAA prevalence in subjects without CAD. A total of 22 studies involving 13,388 patients with CAD met the inclusion criteria. Overall, AAA prevalence in patients with CAD was 8.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.9 to 10.3), significantly higher than in subjects without CAD (odds ratio [OR] 2.42, 95% CI 2.08 to 2.81). Pooled analysis revealed that smoking, arterial hypertension, and concomitant carotid artery stenosis were significantly associated with AAA in patients with CAD (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.61; OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.35; OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.79, respectively). In patients with CAD, AAA prevalence tended to be higher with concomitant peripheral artery disease (OR 2.66, 95% CI 0.82 to 8.61, p = 0.08). In conclusion, AAA prevalence was significantly higher in patients with CAD versus subjects without CAD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources