Uncontained Compared With Contained Power Morcellation in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
- PMID: 26348168
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001039
Uncontained Compared With Contained Power Morcellation in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Abstract
Objective: To compare perioperative outcomes of uncontained and contained power morcellation in total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Methods: Women who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy that required utilization of power morcellation between July 2012 and January 2015 in the Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecology at an academic tertiary care center were included. In February 2014, the division began performing all power morcellation contained within a large insufflated bag in an attempt to reduce dissemination of benign and malignant uterine tissue. Data were collected from a prospective database and analyzed as a retrospective cohort. The primary outcome was operative time. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss, length of stay, pathology, uterine weight, and complications, including blood transfusion, conversion to open, intraoperative organ injury, pelvic infection, readmission, or reoperation.
Results: A total of 152 patients were identified: 101 uncontained morcellations and 51 contained morcellations. The baseline demographic characteristics between the two groups were similar. Operative time was longer in the contained morcellation group (184 compared with 164 minutes, P=.01). There were no cases of visible bag disruption or dissemination of uterine tissue in the contained morcellation group.
Conclusion: Contained power morcellation at the time of total laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with a 20-minute increase in operative time when compared with uncontained morcellation.
Level of evidence: II.
Comment in
-
Uncontained Compared With Contained Power Morcellation in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;127(2):403. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001282. Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26942374 No abstract available.
-
In Reply.Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;127(2):403-4. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001283. Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26942375 No abstract available.
References
-
- Wright KN, Jonsdottir GM, Jorgensen S, Shah N, Einarsson JI. Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies. JSLS 2012;16:519–24.
-
- Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. ACOG Opinion No. 444. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1156–8.
-
- Wiser A, Holcroft CA, Tulandi T, Abenhaim HA. Abdominal versus laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign diseases: evaluation of morbidity and mortality among 465,798 cases. Gynecol Surg 2013;10:117–22.
-
- Kho KA, Anderson TL, Nezhat CH. Intracorporeal electromechanical tissue morcellation a critical review and recommendations for clinical practice. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124:787–93.
-
- Wright JD, Tergas AI, Burke WM, Cui RR, Ananth CV, Chen L, et al.. Uterine pathology in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy using morcellation. JAMA 2014;312:1253–5.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials