Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr;22(4):317-24.
doi: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0060. Epub 2015 Sep 8.

Scale Matters: A Cost-Outcome Analysis of an m-Health Intervention in Malawi

Affiliations

Scale Matters: A Cost-Outcome Analysis of an m-Health Intervention in Malawi

Erin Larsen-Cooper et al. Telemed J E Health. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The primary objectives of this study are to determine cost per user and cost per contact with users of a mobile health (m-health) intervention. The secondary objectives are to map costs to changes in maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) and to estimate costs of alternate implementation and usage scenarios.

Materials and methods: A base cost model, constructed from recurrent costs and selected capital costs, was used to estimate average cost per user and per contact of an m-health intervention. This model was mapped to statistically significant changes in MNCH intermediate outcomes to determine the cost of improvements in MNCH indicators. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to estimate costs in alternate scenarios.

Results: The m-health intervention cost $29.33 per user and $4.33 per successful contact. The average cost for each user experiencing a change in an MNCH indicator ranged from $67 to $355. The sensitivity analyses showed that cost per user could be reduced by 48% if the service were to operate at full capacity.

Conclusions: We believe that the intervention, operating at scale, has potential to be a cost-effective method for improving maternal and child health indicators.

Keywords: child health; cost-outcome; economic evaluation; information and communications technology; maternal health; mobile health.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank, the United Nations Population Division. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2013. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2014
    1. UNICEF. Committing to child survival: A promised renewed—Progress report 2014. New York: UNICEF, 2014
    1. The Center for Innovation & Technology in Public Health, Public Health Institute, Oakland, CA: Leveraging mobile technologies for maternal, newborn and child health. November 2012. Available at www.mhealthknowledge.org/sites/default/files/17_leveraging_mobile_techno... (last accessed March15, 2015)
    1. Tamrat T, Kachnowski S. Special delivery: An analysis of m-Health in maternal and newborn health programs and their outcomes around the world. Matern Child Health J 2012;16:1092–1101 - PubMed
    1. Evans WD, Wallace JL, Snider J. Pilot evaluation of the text4baby mobile health program. BMC Public Health 2012;12:1031. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms