Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep 8:4:e10034.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.10034.

Structural determinants of nuclear export signal orientation in binding to exportin CRM1

Affiliations

Structural determinants of nuclear export signal orientation in binding to exportin CRM1

Ho Yee Joyce Fung et al. Elife. .

Abstract

The Chromosome Region of Maintenance 1 (CRM1) protein mediates nuclear export of hundreds of proteins through recognition of their nuclear export signals (NESs), which are highly variable in sequence and structure. The plasticity of the CRM1-NES interaction is not well understood, as there are many NES sequences that seem incompatible with structures of the NES-bound CRM1 groove. Crystal structures of CRM1 bound to two different NESs with unusual sequences showed the NES peptides binding the CRM1 groove in the opposite orientation (minus) to that of previously studied NESs (plus). Comparison of minus and plus NESs identified structural and sequence determinants for NES orientation. The binding of NESs to CRM1 in both orientations results in a large expansion in NES consensus patterns and therefore a corresponding expansion of potential NESs in the proteome.

Keywords: CRM1; S. cerevisiae; biochemistry; biophysics; exportin-1; human; nuclear export signal; nuclear transport; structural biology; viruses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. hRio2NES and CPEB4NES bind CRM1 in orientation opposite to the PKINES.
(A) Six nuclear export signal (NES) consensus patterns (Φ is Leu, Val, Ile, Phe or Met; X is any amino acid). (B) Structure of PKINES (yellow cartoon) bound to Chromosome Region of Maintenance (CRM1) (gray surface) (3NBY) on the right and PKINES was removed to show hydrophobic pockets P0–P4 in the CRM1 groove on the left panel. (C) Overall structure of the CRM1* (gray)-RanGppNHp (orange)-RanBP1 (light purple)-hRio2NES (blue) complex. (D) Structures of hRio2NES (blue) and CPEB4NES (purple) bound to the CRM1 groove (gray surfaces). All NES peptides are in cartoon and their hydrophobic Φ residues shown as sticks. Their Φ residues and the corresponding P0–P4 CRM1 pockets that they bind are shown below. (E) Kick OMIT map meshes contoured at the 3.0σ level overlaid on the final, refined coordinates for hRio2NES and CPEB4NES. Kicked OMIT maps were generated by PHENIX by omitting the NES peptides. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10034.003
Figure 1—figure supplement 1.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1.. Electron densities of the wild-type NES peptides.
Stereo views of kicked OMIT map meshes contoured at the 3.0σ level, on the final, refined coordinates for (A) hRio2NES and (B) CPEB4NES as shown in sticks. Anomalous difference map for Se-met hRio2NESis calculated in PHENIX and contoured at the 3.0σ level in the leftmost panel in (A). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10034.004
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Comparison of plus and minus NESs.
Pairwise comparison of hRio2NES (blue) or CPEB4NES (purple) with PKINES (yellow; 3NBY) upon superposition of NES-bound CRM1 grooves. Hydrophobic NES residues (Φs) are shown as sticks and orientation of the CRM1 grooves is indicated by positions of the P0–P4 pockets. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10034.006
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Hydrophobic side chain preferences for hRio2NES binding to CRM1.
In vitro pull-down assay (Coomassie-stained SDS/PAGE) of purified human CRM1 binding to immobilized GST-hRio2NES mutants (A) Φ3, Φ4, or Φ5 or (B) Φ1 or Φ2 position mutated in the presence of excess ScRanGTP. Relative band intensities of triplicate experiments are plotted in histograms. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10034.007
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. hRio2NES, CPEB4NES, and their reverse counterparts bind CRM1 with similar binding affinities.
(A) Sequences of NESs used. (B) Binding of FITC-PKINES and various MBP-NESs to CRM1 measured by differential bleaching, monitored by a microscale thermophoresis instrument. MBP-NESs compete with FITC-PKINES for CRM1 in competition titrations. Fitted binding curves are overlaid onto data points with error bars representing the mean and standard deviation of triplicate titrations. Dissociation constants (KDs) of the NESs are reported below the graphs with ranges in brackets representing the 68.3% confidence intervals. Binding of MBP-NPMmutANES (a moderate CRM1 binder) and MBP-SNUPNNES (a weak binder) is shown on the rightmost panel for reference. *Experiments performed on separate days were fitted with a new triplicate set of direct bind titrations. (C) Leptomycin B (LMB) sensitive nuclear export activity of EYFP-NLS-NES fusions in HeLa cells. YFP (pseudocolored in yellow), Hoechst (pseudocolored in blue), and merged images were captured using spinning disk confocal microscope (60×). Images are maximum intensity projection of five confocal Z stacks spaced 0.3 µm apart. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10034.008
Figure 4—figure supplement 1.
Figure 4—figure supplement 1.. Binding affinities of shorter hRio2NES and CPEB4NES constructs.
(A) Sequences of shorter hRio2NES and CPEB4NES constructs. (B) Binding of these NESs to CRM1 measured by differential bleaching. Comparison of hRio2NES constructs in Figure 4 and in this supplement shows that the addition of a lysine and glycine residue C-terminal of the NES helix weakens binding. In contrast, comparison of CPEB4NES constructs shows that addition of methionine and arginine C-terminal of the CPEB4NES helix improved binding. One possible explanation is addition of these residues may have affected helical propensity of the NESs, and hence affect binding affinity. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10034.009
Figure 4—figure supplement 2.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2.. Differential bleaching of fluorescence probe in a sigmoidal and binding-dependent manner.
Fluorogram of normalized fluorescence signal collected from the direct titration of CRM1 into fluorescent-labeled PKINES peptide in presence of excess ScRanGTP is plotted on the top panel. Traces are colored in rainbow, indicating increasing concentrations of CRM1. The shaded areas in blue and red represent the time frames where data collected represent pre-bleach and post-bleach fluorescence, respectively. Data points and the fitted curve are plotted in the panel below, with the data points colored according to their respective time-trace. Residuals are plotted on the bottom panel. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10034.010
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. hRio2NES-R and CPEB4NES-R are plus NESs.
(A) Structures of hRio2NES-R (light blue) and CPEB4NES-R (light pink) bound to CRM1 (gray surfaces). (B) Pairwise comparisons of PKINES (yellow), hRio2NES-R (light blue), and hRio2NES (blue) when bound to CRM1. (C) In vitro pull-down assay of purified human CRM1 binding to immobilized GST-hRio2NES-R mutants (Φ3 or Φ4 mutated) in the presence of excess ScRanGTP. Relative band intensities of triplicate experiments are plotted in histograms. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10034.011
Figure 5—figure supplement 1.
Figure 5—figure supplement 1.. Electron densities of the reverse NES peptides.
Stereo views of kicked OMIT map meshes, on the final coordinates for (A) hRio2NES-R, (B) CPEB4NES-R and as shown in sticks. Anomalous difference map for Se-met hRio2NES-R is contoured at the 3.0σ level in the leftmost panel in (A). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10034.012
Figure 6.
Figure 6.. N-terminal ΦXΦ motif generates a minus orientation PKINES-Flip mutant.
(A) Sequence alignment of PKINES and PKINES-Flip peptides with their hydrophobic residues of ΦXΦ motifs in red and the NES helix shown as a cylinder. (B) Pull-down assay of immobilized GST-PKINES mutants, purified CRM1 and RanGTP (Coomassie-stained SDS/PAGE). (C) Structure of the PKINES-Flip3 peptide (red, in cartoon with Φ residues in sticks) bound to CRM1 (gray surface) with its sequence and CRM1 pockets for each Φ residue shown below. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10034.013
Figure 6—figure supplement 1.
Figure 6—figure supplement 1.. Electron densities of the PKINES-Flip3 NES peptide.
Stereo views of kicked OMIT map meshes, on the final coordinates for PKINES-Flip3. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10034.014
Figure 7.
Figure 7.. Prevalence of putative minus NESs in the Dbase data set.
(A) Consensus patterns for minus NESs in new NES classes 1a-R to 1d-R (reverse of class 1 patterns). (B) The number of sequences in the 246 proteins in Dbase that match the class 1 (+) and class 1-R (−) consensus patterns. NES regions are defined according to original literature that experimentally identified CRM1 cargos and their NES regions. (C) The numbers of NES regions in Dbase divided into four categories according to the consensus matches they overlap with. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10034.015
Figure 8.
Figure 8.. Putative minus NESs in the Dbase data set.
(A) Summary of putative minus NESs (in the Dbase data set that match class 1-R patterns exclusively) tested for CRM1 binding. Nap1p (*) was previously shown to direct nuclear export in cells even though no CRM1 binding was observed (Xu et al., 2015). (B) Putative minus NESs that bind CRM1 in pull-down assays with CRM1 and RanGTP. (C) Putative minus NESs that show no observable CRM1 binding. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10034.016

References

    1. Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkoczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, Echols N, Headd JJ, Hung LW, Kapral GJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, McCoy AJ, Moriarty NW, Oeffner R, Read RJ, Richardson DC, Richardson JS, Terwilliger TC, Zwart PH. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography. 2010;66:213–221. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Afonine PV, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Echols N, Headd JJ, Moriarty NW, Mustyakimov M, Terwilliger TC, Urzhumtsev A, Zwart PH, Adams PD. Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine. Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography. 2012;68:352–367. doi: 10.1107/S0907444912001308. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akopian D, Shen K, Zhang X, Shan SO. Signal recognition particle: an essential protein-targeting machine. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 2013;82:693–721. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-072711-164732. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bevington PR, Robinson DK. Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill; 1992.
    1. Brautigam CA. Calculations and publication-quality illustrations for analytical ultracentrifugation data. Methods in Enzymology. 2015;562:109–133. doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2015.05.001. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances