Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2015 Dec;59(12):7232-9.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.01713-15. Epub 2015 Sep 8.

Meropenem-RPX7009 Concentrations in Plasma, Epithelial Lining Fluid, and Alveolar Macrophages of Healthy Adult Subjects

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Meropenem-RPX7009 Concentrations in Plasma, Epithelial Lining Fluid, and Alveolar Macrophages of Healthy Adult Subjects

Eric Wenzler et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

The steady-state concentrations of meropenem and the β-lactamase inhibitor RPX7009 in plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar macrophage (AM) concentrations were obtained in 25 healthy, nonsmoking adult subjects. Subjects received a fixed combination of meropenem (2 g) and RPX7009 (2 g) administered every 8 h, as a 3-h intravenous infusion, for a total of three doses. A bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage were performed once in each subject at 1.5, 3.25, 4, 6, or 8 h after the start of the last infusion. Meropenem and RPX7009 achieved a similar time course and magnitude of concentrations in plasma and ELF. The mean pharmacokinetic parameters ± the standard deviations of meropenem and RPX7009 determined from serial plasma concentrations were as follows: Cmax = 58.2 ± 10.8 and 59.0 ± 8.4 μg/ml, Vss = 16.3 ± 2.6 and 17.6 ± 2.6 liters; CL = 11.1 ± 2.1 and 10.1 ± 1.9 liters/h, and t1/2 = 1.03 ± 0.15 and 1.27 ± 0.21 h, respectively. The intrapulmonary penetrations of meropenem and RPX7009 were ca. 63 and 53%, respectively, based on the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 h (AUC0-8) values of ELF and total plasma concentrations. When unbound plasma concentrations were considered, ELF penetrations were 65 and 79% for meropenem and RPX7009, respectively. Meropenem concentrations in AMs were below the quantitative limit of detection, whereas median concentrations of RPX7009 in AMs ranged from 2.35 to 6.94 μg/ml. The results from the present study lend support to exploring a fixed combination of meropenem (2 g) and RPX7009 (2 g) for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections caused by meropenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens susceptible to the combination of meropenem-RPX7009.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Mean (± the SD) concentration-versus-time profile of meropenem and RPX7009 in plasma (A) and epithelial lining fluid (B) before and after the third dose meropenem (2 g) and RPX7009 (2 g) administered as a 3-h i.v. infusion. In plate A, meropenem is illustrated by the filled circles and a solid line, and RPX7009 is illustrated by open circles and a dashed line. In plate B, meropenem is illustrated by the filled triangles and a solid line, and RPX7009 is illustrated by open triangles and a dashed line. Shaded region represents the 3-h infusion period. The y axis is in the log scale.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Individual concentrations of meropenem in plasma (A; ●) and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) (B; ▲) and RPX7009 in plasma (C; ○) and ELF (D; △) at 1.5, 3.25, 4, 6, and 8 h after the third dose of meropenem (2 g) and RPX7009 (2 g) administered as a 3-h i.v. infusion. The shaded region represents the 3-h infusion period. Solid and dashed lines represent the median concentrations in plasma and ELF, respectively. The y axis is in the log scale.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Individual concentrations of RPX7009 in alveolar macrophages (AM) (open squares) at 1.5, 3.25, 4, 6, and 8 h after the third dose of meropenem (2 g) and RPX7009 (2 g) administered as a 3-h i.v. infusion. The shaded region represents the 3-h infusion period. The solid line represents the median concentration in AM. The y axis is in the log scale.
FIG 4
FIG 4
Mean (± the SD) plasma (● and ○; solid line) and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) (▲ and △; dashed lines) concentration-versus-time profiles of meropenem (A) and RPX7009 (B) at 1.5, 3.25, 4, 6, and 8 h after the third dose of meropenem (2 g) and RPX7009 (2 g) administered as a 3-h i.v. infusion. The shaded region represents the 3-h infusion period. The y axis is in the log scale.

References

    1. Spellberg B, Bartlett JG, Gilbert DN. 2013. The future of antibiotics and resistance. N Engl J Med 368:299–302. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1215093. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Livermore DM. 2011. British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Working Party on The Urgent Need: Regenerating Antibacterial Drug Discovery and Development. Discovery research: the scientific challenge of finding new antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:1941–1944. - PubMed
    1. Nordmann P, Naas T, Poirel L. 2011. Global spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Emerg Infect Dis 17:1791–1798. doi:10.3201/eid1710.110655. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Falagas ME, Lourida P, Poulikakos P, Rafailidis PI, Tansarli GS. 2014. Antibiotic treatment of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: systematic evaluation of the available evidence. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:654–663. doi:10.1128/AAC.01222-13. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2013. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2013. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA: http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/pdf/ar-threats-2013...

Publication types

MeSH terms