Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;116(2):158-66.
doi: 10.1038/hdy.2015.81. Epub 2015 Sep 9.

Using the variability of linkage disequilibrium between subpopulations to infer sweeps and epistatic selection in a diverse panel of chickens

Affiliations

Using the variability of linkage disequilibrium between subpopulations to infer sweeps and epistatic selection in a diverse panel of chickens

T M Beissinger et al. Heredity (Edinb). 2016 Feb.

Abstract

A whole-genome scan for identifying selection acting on pairs of linked loci is proposed and implemented. The scan is based on , one of Ohta's 1982 measures of between-population linkage disequilibrium (LD). An approximate empirical null distribution for the statistic is suggested. Although the partitioning of LD into between-population components was originally used to investigate epistatic selection, we demonstrate that values of may also be influenced by single-locus selective sweeps with linkage but no epistasis. The proposed scan is implemented in a diverse panel of chickens including 72 distinct breeds genotyped at 538 298 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. In all, 1723 locus pairs are identified as putatively corresponding to a selective sweep or epistatic selection. These pairs of loci generally cluster to form overlapping or neighboring signals of selection. Known variants that were expected to have been under selection in the panel are identified, as well as an assortment of novel regions that have putatively been under selection in chickens. Notably, a promising pair of genes located 8 MB apart on chromosome 9 are identified based on as demonstrating strong evidence of dispersive epistatic selection between populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Null vs experimental distributions. Histograms comparing the null and experimental distribution for formula image. Observe that the distributions are quite similar, but the experimental distribution is slightly inflated.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Location of significant locus pairs. A whole-genome map of loci where significant values of formula image were identified in the chicken genome. The position of every marker that was part of a significant pair is represented. Positions are plotted according to the galGal4 assembly. These loci are those putatively under dispersive selective sweeps or dispersive cis-acting epistatic selection.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The BCDO2 locus. Depiction of significant locus pairs identified in the BCDO2 region of chromosome 24, and the formula image value observed for each significant pair. The height of each dashed line depicts the value of formula image observed for that pair.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Sweeps vs potential epistatic selection. formula image values for two example regions. a and b demonstrate region on chromosome 5 showing patterns consistent with a large selective sweep. c and d are of a region on chromosome 6, where significance was not clear except for specific locus pairs, suggestive of epistasis. (a) Significant locus pairs identified across a region of chromosome 5; (b) formula image for every locus pair across the same region of chromosome 5. Values are plotted at the midpoint of the locus pair. Significant pairs are highlighted in red; (c) Significant locus pairs identified across a region of chromosome 6; (d) formula image for every locus pair across the same region of chromosome 6.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akey JM. (2009). Constructing genomic maps of positive selection in humans: where do we go from here? Genome Res 19: 711–722. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akey JM, Zhang G, Zhang K, Jin L, Shriver MD. (2002). Interrogating a high-density SNP map for signatures of natural selection. Genome Res 12: 1805–1814. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beissinger TM, Hirsch CN, Vaillancourt B, Deshpande S, Barry K, Buell CR et al. (2013). A genome-wide scan for evidence of selection in a maize population under long-term artificial selection for ear number. Genetics 196: 829–840. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Black WC IV, Krafsur ES. (1985). A FORTRAN program for the calculation and analysis of two-locus linkage disequilibrium coefficients. Theor Appl Genet 70: 491–496. - PubMed
    1. Chen H, Patterson N, Reich D. (2010). Population differentiation as a test for selective sweeps. Genome Res 20: 393–402. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types