Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov 21;13(43):10716-25.
doi: 10.1039/c5ob01536g.

RGD-conjugated two-photon absorbing near-IR emitting fluorescent probes for tumor vasculature imaging

Affiliations

RGD-conjugated two-photon absorbing near-IR emitting fluorescent probes for tumor vasculature imaging

Xiling Yue et al. Org Biomol Chem. .

Abstract

Observation of the activation and inhibition of angiogenesis processes is important in the progression of cancer. Application of targeting peptides, such as a small peptide that contains adjacent L-arginine (R), glycine (G) and L-aspartic acid (D) residues can afford high selectivity and deep penetration in vessel imaging. To facilitate deep tissue vasculature imaging, probes that can be excited via two-photon absorption (2PA) in the near-infrared (NIR) and subsequently emit in the NIR are essential. In this study, the enhancement of tissue image quality with RGD conjugates was investigated with new NIR-emitting pyranyl fluorophore derivatives in two-photon fluorescence microscopy. Linear and nonlinear photophysical properties of the new probes were comprehensively characterized; significantly the probes exhibited good 2PA over a broad spectral range from 700-1100 nm. Cell and tissue images were then acquired and examined, revealing deep penetration and high contrast with the new pyranyl RGD-conjugates up to 350 μm in tumor tissue.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Absorption (solid lines) and emission (dashed lines) spectra in toluene (black), DCM (red), and DMSO (blue), excitation anisotropy in silicone oil (dark green), and two-photon absorption spectrum in DCM (dark red circles) for 1; (B) absorption (solid lines) and emission (dashed lines) spectra in DMSO (black), and water (red), excitation anisotropy in DMSO (dark green), two-photon absorption spectrum in DMSO (dark red triangles) for 2; (C) absorption (solid lines) an emission (dashed lines) spectra in toluene (black), and DCM (red), excitation anisotropy in silicone oil (dark green), and two-photon absorption spectrum in DCM (dark blue triangles) for 3.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Absorption and emission spectra for 1a in DMSO; (B) Absorption and emission spectra for 2a in DMSO; (C) Absorption (solid lines) and emission (dashed lines) spectra for 3 in organic nanoparticles without, 3a (black), and with, 3b (red) added lecithin.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Size distribution of organic nanoparticles 3a (A) and 3b (B) determined by DLS.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Fluorescence (A–C, E–G) and DIC overlay (D, H) images of U87MG cells after 1 h incubation with 1 (A), 1a (B–D), 2 (E) or 2a (F–H). B and F were pre-incubated with free RGD peptide. Scale bars are 10 μm.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Fluorescence (A–C) and DIC overlay (D) images of HCT116 cells after 1 h incubation with medium (A), 3a (B), or 3b (C, D). Scale bars are 10 μm.
Figure 6
Figure 6
3D reconstruction images show the vasculature in LLC tumor implants that were extracted from mice injected with 1 (A), 1a (B), 2 (C) and 2a (D). Arrows in A indicate non-specific uptake of 1. Each image shows 3D view (left), x-z view (right top) and x-y view (right bottom). Scale bars are 50 μm.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Optical cross-section fluorescence at 200 μm depth for 1 (A), 1a (B), 2 (D) and 2a (E) were analyzed. Scale bars are 50 μm.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Synthesis of compounds 1 and 1a.
Scheme 2
Scheme 2
Synthesis of compounds 2 and 2a.
Scheme 3
Scheme 3
Synthesis of compounds 3.

References

    1. Fukumura D, Duda DG, Munn LL, Jain RK. Microcirculation. 2010;17(3):206–225. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Provenzano PP, Eliceiri KW, Keely PJ. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2009;26(4):357–370. - PubMed
    2. Tozer GM, Ameer-Beg SM, Baker J, Barber PR, Hill SA, Hodgkiss RJ, Locke R, Prise VE, Wilson I, Vojnovic B. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2005;57(1):135–152. - PubMed
    3. Beerling E, Ritsma L, Vrisekoop N, Derksen PWB, van Rheenen J. J Cell Sci. 2011;124(3):299–310. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nishida N, Yano H, Nishida T, Kamura T, Kojiro M. Vasc Health Risk Manage. 2006;2(3):213–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Avraamides CJ, Garmy-Susini B, Varner JA. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8(8):604–617. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brooks PC, Clark RA, Cheresh DA. Science. 1994;264(5158):569–71. - PubMed
    2. Friedlander M, Brooks PC, Shaffer RW, Kincaid CM, Varner JA, Cheresh DA. Science. 1995;270(5241):1500–2. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources